We do not find it necessary to elaborate on the rhetorical statements aimed at justifying the pursuit of equality between men and women, as equality is a self-evident and civilized matter, Despite this, women in this region are still burdened by the clash between ancient heritage and modernity, Women are still traditionally considered servants in the house during the day and slaves in bed at night or whenever the man desires,While modernity has enabled women to practice men’s professions, meaning they have become teachers, doctors, ministers, army commanders, and so on, they have nevertheless remained vulnerable to the violation of their dignity, for example, through polygamy and similar concepts and practices that diminish their human rights and turn them into commodities to be bought and sold in official marriage contracts, and not only in other forms of slavery such as the slavery of what is called temporary marriage or Misyar marriage and others of about 16 types of slavery.

Women are still ostracized, rejected, and considered deficient in intellect and religion, and a corrupter of prayer, They are controlled by a sick, neurotic, male mentality that distorts them and diminishes their social and life role, turning them into an “object” for marriage and procreation, There is no recognition of their sexual needs, which are monopolized by men. Therefore, they are circumcised based on the mistaken belief that circumcision modifies their sexual needs, Where is the logic or right in modifying their sexual needs? Why isn’t the male’s sexual need modified by castration, for example? Here, religious men insist on securing the male’s sexual needs through polygamy, which supposedly fulfills his sexual needs when one of his wives is menstruating, even though intercourse with a menstruating woman is possible, as narrated by one of the Mothers of the Believers, The monopolization of sexual needs by men is considered a kind of male neurosis that negates the humanity of women and of men as well, and negates love, turning it into an animalistic practice.To defend polygamy and other disastrous practices, a group of pseudo-men of this world and religion claim that, statistically, polygamy is not that disastrous, that it is very rare and limited to a few isolated cases and to a few segments of society!!!!!!, which constitute 30% of marriages in rural Damascus, and the spread of polygamy in Upper Egypt may be similar. Therefore, it is said that this small minority cannot cause a significant social imbalance, despite the fact that polygamy is a debilitating phenomenon because it is animalistic, in addition to the impossibility of being just between wives, as the verse says, “Marry those that please you of women,” etc.! Furthermore, achieving justice does not justify polygamy, and polygamy is not a marginal phenomenon, as the percentage of 30% is not marginal, and even if the percentage is marginal, it does not justify the insistence of the patriarchal sheikhly system on polygamy, which is permitted in the articles of the Personal Status Law, and which represents an animalistic, non-social state, meaning that it deprives those who practice it of their social and human nature.

  Some believe that polygamy expresses a state of suffocating schizophrenia of the principle of equality, because there is no polyandry as demanded by Ms. Nadine Al-Budair,We see that polygamy represents a legitimate privilege to practice bestiality, and whatever its statistical status, it remains antisocial and despised of humanity in general and of men as well, who are considered disturbed and psychologically ill, even if they are forced to be satisfied with one wife, Even the one wife remains deprived of dignity by a masculinity that is very different from manhood.

   This abnormal, pathological situation generally leads to psychological disturbances and family breakdowns that are reflected on girls and boys, distorting them and emptying them of human feeling, The male son becomes more distorted than the crushed girl. A situation that exposes the female and male to emotional emptiness and to the animalization of sex and the problems of impotence, frigidity and frequent divorce that follow, Sex without love is animalization, Correct sex cannot be practiced except within the framework of correct love, Brothel sex is deficient, and what it lacks is love and creative affection that accompanies true sexual desire.

The people who talk the most about women’s rights and equality between men and women are the Salafis from various religious schools,Their throats almost burst from screaming in pain over women and their rights, and their tears have turned into rivers and seas as a result of their clownish crying over women, In reality, we see them dealing with women as something shameful, to the point that their presence is an obstacle to performing prayer.   “A dog, a donkey, or a woman interrupts a person’s prayer ” As for when a woman abandons the bed of the beast, the angels will chase her and curse her until she returns humbled and submissive.

Every attempt to humanize the treatment of women or between women and men is met with fierce resistance from pseudo-men of the world and religion, Sometimes, the idea of ​​women being humane is seen as contradicting the text, Sharia, Hadith, and interpretation, and at other times as imitating the innovations of the infidel West , It is as if the West is the one that ordered the beating of women to discipline them, allowed their divorce with three pronouncements, imposed the hijab and niqab on them, and turned them into an “object” to be bought and sold, The West is the one that allowed polygamy, established Sharia courts, and permitted temporary marriage, pleasure marriage, and others. In short, the West is the “scapegoat” that pseudo-men of religion and the world cannot do without!