There are naive notions about religious heritage, or the religion of heritage, such as the belief that this heritage can give modernity meaning, significance, and substance. This naiveté assumes that heritage will contribute to changing the existential reality in order to open a horizon of meaning for a crisis-ridden modernity, by “breathing” its spirit into modern values ​​to revitalize them, This naiveté imagines that the idea of ​​inheriting God’s mantle will save humanity from its fundamental crisis by liberating the individual from their primitive impulses, represented by sexual and consumerist pleasures, and making them cling anew to values ​​of sanctity, greatness, sublimity, and glory— that is, cultivating a kind of vitality in the spirit of modernity. It is naive to await divine deliverance through those who represent God on Earth, those who inherit God’s mantle, It is naive to attempt to reproduce the past to save the present and the future, It is also naive to practice excessive veneration and worship to bribe the Creator, or those who act on His behalf, Reality has proven that these individuals have stolen and occupied They devised a scheme to establish their material paradise on earth. In Harun al-Rashid’s paradise on earth, it was said that there were 3,000 to 4,000 slave girls in service, and the stallion al-Rashid had intercourse with all of them, Here, Harun al-Rashid surpassed God in his promises regarding the number of virgins in paradise for every pious and pure believer,Al-Rashid embodied the Creator’s promise to the believers of hundreds of virgins, and thus he became the greatest warrior, so he was given the largest number of slave girls.

   The people failed to accomplish the project of modernity, and they were confused about the difference between modernity and modernization, which was done here and there by means of oil, and not by the efforts of the people, who remained mentally and methodologically in a consumerist and unproductive nomadism, For the nomads, sustenance is not from production, but from the spoils of war, and its source is unseen, for God provides for whomever He wills! In contrast to other peoples who create their lives, freedoms, food, clothing, water, medicine, and all their needs with their own hands.

 History testifies that those who speak in the name of God wanted to revive earthly life as a paradise before the promised day, which was and still is like a check without funds. So they established empires of concubines and empires of treasuries, as the era of Harun al-Rashid, which the Bedouin boast about, testifies. And here are the descendants today legislating “sexual jihad” which the jihadists practice as a transfer of heavenly paradise to earth, Thus they considered rape and male debauchery as a “victory for the heavenly Sharia.”

What some see as a solution is precisely the problem, If modernity has a problem, it is its religious legacy, whose decay and ruin are evident in the present, Therefore, what people need is to build new, different relationships, with new forms, concepts, and values. Many Enlightenment thinkers, such as al-Tahtawi, Abda, and others, have promoted this, acknowledging the existence of a crisis, but failing to resolve it for several reasons related to the content of their proposed solutions. These solutions should have been born outside the confines of religion, not imprisoned within it. Enlightenment now means taking responsibility for oneself and liberating God and the unseen from their responsibility for humanity. Humans are the ones who created what exists on Earth; they created life on Earth. This life was evolutionary, but it was thwarted by illusion, ignorance, fanaticism, and blind imitation of the past, which imbued it with an existential falsehood. This falsehood signifies submission to a transcendent, sacred, and rigid will—a will that, moreover, is tyrannical and exercised by human hands in the name of a mythical heaven. The myth that limited its hypothetical ability to circumvent man through the human successor, who was a representative of the hypothetical creator.

Existential falsehood manifests itself in other ways, including religious narcissism. An example of this is attributing every invention or innovation to the Quran, as did the billionaire Zaghloul El-Naggar, who wrote a book on scientific miracles whose scientific value is not worth a bag of garbage. The herd of scientific miracles did not realize that the progress of humanity was made by humanity and not by a group of it. It is not necessary to consider human progress as the property of the West, for the West is a people who think and invent and are not preoccupied with trying to nationalize and monopolize innovation and invention, as did the sick Arab mentality represented by Zaghloul El-Naggar and the concept of the best nation, which refused to engage in invention, creativity and science and devoted itself to trying to steal it with the mentality of war spoils, which filled the treasuries of the caliphs, to the point that Harun al-Rashid stole the clouds and their rain, saying that their revenue would return to him wherever and whenever it rained!

The issue of liberation must be reconsidered, for liberation is not limited to one aspect, but rather includes, most importantly, the concept of man enslaved by illusions concerning the Creator. Since He is capable of everything, His saying that the Arabs are the best nation must be sanctified and respected. When we examine the situation of the Arabs within the context of the circumstances they have put themselves in regarding reliance and trust in the Creator and the results of all that, such as backwardness and decline to the point of hunger, i.e., loss of food security, then the view must be corrected, the course must be corrected, and the formula of reliance on God and His sanctity and His holy things must be nullified. Then, we must be keen on the gains of the modern world represented in “individual independence and freedom of the self.” For freedom, on its existential level, is for man to think and act in such a way that he is not enslaved by a name or origin and is not imprisoned by a doctrine or model.

The so-called absolute truths and ultimate control over outcomes must be categorically denied, that is, the consecration of man’s self-perception as creator. Creation is a human matter or a human production. We did not see God ascend to the moon, nor did He create man, but rather he is born through the fertilization of the egg with the sperm, and not through God breathing into Mary’s womb as stated in the book of nonsense of the true religion.

Humanity created the concept of God for positive purposes, and when those positive uses ran dry, humanity sent God to the nursing home, and now, in most parts of the world, He is found there, The claim by some in this region that God is present among them and will grant them victory is nothing but a colossal deception, It is a proven fact that God did not grant them victory, that He did not feed them, and that their praise and glorification of Him was merely superficial (a superficial religiosity), They tried to deceive Him and fool Him when they carried out invasions, thefts, and murders in His name, They imagined that He would accept them as sycophantic, flattering henchmen, like court poets, They bestowed upon Him both flattering and unflattering names, claiming, with the intention of praise, that He was cunning and tyrannical, even though cunning and tyranny are not good qualities, Thus, He abandoned them despite their continued flattery and glorification, then tarnished His reputation with their thefts in His name and their immorality, thereby bankrupting Him morally, And what was here Nietzsche had no choice but to declare the death of God, that is, the death of their invention, which was morally murdered, Nietzsche did not realize that the death of God meant the end of the concept of the Übermensch, Whoever tried to transform some into the Übermensch through God turned man into the lowest creature after the death of Nietzsche’s God!