The distorted Syrian human being

The spread of Muhammadan movements was accompanied by the dissemination of concepts contrary to the humanization of the human being, Most or even all of them had an isolationist, violent, terrorist, and bloody character, Therefore, most of those religious movements deserved the accusation of terrorism, alienation from humanity, and inability to harmonize with others.

All these movements and currents claim that religion, with its various orientations, represents their guiding principle, aiming to achieve what religion calls for, In this regard, we acknowledge that we do not possess sufficient and complete knowledge of everything this school of thought desires, The theoretical sources are numerous and their contradictions are significant, Religious sects are many, their disagreements are fundamental, and the conflict between them has not ceased for the last fourteen centuries, This is due to their differing understandings and interpretations of texts whose origin, content, and authorship are questionable, Let us take, for example, the companion Ibn Sarh, who apostatized after having been a scribe of the revelation, Ibn Sarh would alter and change the wording of the verses and narrations that Ibn Abdullah dictated to him, According to Ibn Abdullah’s own admission, he was aware of Ibn Sarh’s alterations and told him, “Write it as you wish; this is how it was revealed.” Then there is the story of the verses that were eaten by mice, according to Aisha’s own admission, How could mice possibly gnaw on the verses of God?! All of this, and much more, confirms that what has reached us in the form of texts was either distorted according to the whims of Ibn Sarh and his ilk, or It was lost after it was eaten by a goat, insect, mouse, or something else.

The biggest problem was the reflection of all of that on the history of the region in the last fourteen centuries, The groups of this religion got lost between interpretations, efforts, superstitions, forgeries, backward and fabricated explanations, so that this religion lost recognition as one religion, or even as a religion, There are those who claim that this religion does not exist, lost between texts, jurisprudence, and contradictory interpretations, and protected by the sacred and rigidity, Despite that protection, this doctrinal trend lost prestige and respect and turned into an obstacle to progress and a prisoner of rigidity and backwardness, Removing the cover of the sacred from the texts may turn them from a miracle into a deadly incapacity and failure.

A few years after the birth of the call of Ibn Abdullah, the conquests began, The new believers, the conquerors, did not interact with civilized peoples except on a material and criminal level, that is, the level of tribute and spoils, The men of the sword did not learn from civilized peoples such as the peoples of the Levant anything worth mentioning, The conquerors claimed that the peoples of the Levant and the peoples of North Africa, then the Spaniards, the Indians, and others welcomed Khalid Ibn al-Walid and his likes with roses, and they did not bother to answer the question: Why all those roses for those who colonized them and forced them to pay tribute while they were humiliated, or converted them to Islam, or fought them? And were the people of the Levant happy with Islamization, tribute, or war? Were the Berbers happy with the arrival of the desert Bedouin with Uqba ibn Nafi? If they had been happy, there would have been no need to repeat the conquest of North Africa eight times, The Indians were not happy with the conquest of India, nor were the Spaniards happy with the conquest of Spain by Tariq ibn Ziyad and then Musa ibn Nusayr, The conquerors were rejected and hated, just like their descendants in this era, Even the descendants of the Ottomans were not happy with the culture brought by Islam, The proof of this was the Ataturkist backlash against the Arabic language, Even the Muslim refugees were not happy with the new religion, as evidenced by their insistence on remaining in the West as refugees and their refusal to return to the countries they came from, despite their clashes with European societies and their inability to integrate and live harmoniously with European peoples, The insistence of some of them on remaining in the lands of the infidels and their clinging to the Muhammadan identity is not evidence of their passion for this identity, but rather evidence of their inability to acquire any other identity due to their intellectual stagnation and lack of awareness, A few years after the start of the asylum, which was called political while it was economic, led to the unraveling of the relationship between the Easterners from the Arab countries in particular and the Europeans, who experienced large movements of displacement and asylum, Germany, which was starving in 1948, received 8 million people from Eastern Europe at that difficult time, and these people were able to integrate into German society,Even the Turks, with numbers exceeding 5 million in Germany, were able to integrate, albeit partially, with the Europeans in an acceptable way, while about 1 million Syrians failed miserably in Europe, especially in Germany, which now wants to deport them to their country by any means necessary!!!

The movement of millions of Syrians to Europe is an indication of their failure to build a state in their country, Whoever cannot build a state in their country cannot integrate with other peoples, The Syrians were unable to live with each other, so it is no wonder that they were unable to live with Europeans! The distortion and deficiency of the Syrian people to this extent was not expected!