The state of the prophets among the group of individuals and members of society

    We live in this age of a state of crowding among the prophets, some of them came imposed a imposed by the sword, not only in its founding historical context, but the sword remained their companion throughout their lives, which reached 1450 years. These prophets relied on the phenomenon of mythical miracles and on forgery and miracles that were a failure, to prove the right of their existence as prophets and accept their authority and the necessity of obeying them. Some of them did not hesitate to use violence and intimidation when they felt threatened, such as disobedience and rebellion against them.

                  There is another kind of prophets who were met with dire need for them. They are many and each one of them added great positivity to human life that is difficult to the point of being impossible to do without. They are, for example, Newton and electricity, then those who invented the car, the airplane, social communication, then social and health security. They are Spinoza, Hegel and others, such as the prophet Mark and his miracle of ensuring communication between people in image, sound and letters without charge . Then those who invented the letter, the number, the wheel and the law from the ancient Syrians.  Mentioning all the prophets of need or necessity requires volumes!

             Is there a human need for a creature to tell us how to kill and why we kill? We are aware of the evils of killing, and humanity does not need a teacher in this regard, especially a teacher of subjects that were never within the purview of the doctrine they preach, but rather within the tasks of sociology and politics, which are older than them and their revelations. Political sociology is the founder and organizer of the establishment of societies on the globe in the form of states, before the presence of religion and monotheism by tens of thousands of years.

                 They came to us with monotheism and its sword. The monotheists said that monotheism is a reform movement. If we assume that monotheism is capable of reform in a specific historical context, is reform possible through monotheism in other historical contexts?! And what do we do with this monotheism that has occupied our minds? And it insists on continuing to occupy minds even after the hypothetical need for it has passed, and after it has become harmful and transformed into a colonial disaster for a mind that does not allow it to get rid of its tormentor and distorter. This is in contrast to the Prophet Newton or the Prophet Mark. Would Newton object to us if we thought of eliminating electricity from our lives? And would the Prophet Mark object to us if we closed our accounts in his shop? Newton and others like him are prophets of necessity, while the prophets of forced occupation of the mind, imposition and intimidation are prophets of harm and damage to the mind and life.

                Monotheism has produced a distorted form of the state, a one-dimensional totalitarian state that has marginalized man and made him a spectator to being manipulated as desired by the heavenly prophets and their men, who want to subject the state and society to the will of God, that is, to their will. That is, all institutions that form the political organization of society must be based on their approach. Meaning! Society must be part of an arrangement subject to religion and its rulings. The men of religion have made society and the state subject to the will of someone outside of them, with no subordination or belonging except to it.

              Logically, man must aspire to build the society necessary for the establishment of the state, and the state is a necessity and has been for many centuries. There is no alternative to it, whether immediately or in the medium or long term. This socio-political system encounters many obstacles. The first obstacle is the peculiarity of the religion of the heavenly prophets, which is considered an individual personality characteristic representing an individual consciousness that is strongly distinct from the collective consciousness. Relying on the personal characteristic in building society leads to a society of individuals, or more precisely, to a group of individuals. Individuals in the state system are individuals in society. This situation is the opposite of the society of individuals represented by the priority of personal affiliation over the rest of the social affiliations. It is a state of people and individuals, which cannot succeed, and its inevitable fate is extinction.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *