The truth of those who said that going back to the past represents the failure to address the problems of the present, some of which are born in the past and continue in the present, this continuation negates the purely past character of the problems, which sometimes become present, from these problems the issue of belonging and Syrian citizenship, and then the contradiction or compatibility of this identity with the Arab or Islamic identity, and then the problem of building the state of Syria or at least its failure and its relationship with its management and care in the last century.

Who are the Syrians and what do they want? It can simply be said that the Syrians are a historical product and not a Martian product that fell from the sky, for Syrians and Syrians a homeland that has to be stable humane, democratic, free, etc., so history must be understood and its relationship with the current bad and unfortunate situation, not with the intention of self-flogging, as some wish to name this process.

Historically, the Arabization and Islamization of Syria began with the launch of the occupation armies or the Arab Bedouin conquest from the Arabian Peninsula towards the Levant, Iraq and other areas, as those areas were under the rule of the Romans and Persians for centuries, it was said that the Bedouin armies came to liberate the Levant and Iraq from the grip of the Persians and the Romans, and then these armies exceeded the borders of the Levant and Iraq in their progress east and west towards the Persians, Ahvaz, Khorasan and Turkmenistan to the countries of India and Sindh, west, those armies exceeded Egypt to North Africa to Spain, and in record time by the standards of that time, this speed did not return to the supernatural Arab Bedouin force, but to the military weakness of the forces that prevailed at that time, the angels of heaven did not fight with the Arabs, contrary to what the legend says and contrary to what they claim, the angels do not fight and do not fight.

The deceitful empires of polytheism and disbelief have been plagued for several reasons, including the depletion of these empires with long wars and bloody conflicts, and then the aging of these empires, which facilitated the pursuit of young tribes eager for a larger and better outcome of the past, i.e. the spoils of war, the invasion was the profession of the tribes of pre-Islam and continued in Islam, and the spoils of war were their source of livelihood, the culture of invasion remained in Islam, which was developed to distribute the spoils rules and rules for the land to be lived and known even in this era, the flag was Islamic, as for the mentality and practice was nomadic ignorant par excellence.

It is stated in the definition of conquest that “the entry of Islam to the countries where it spread after wars and battles”, this means in practice that Muslims entered all those parts after wars and fierce battles between the forces of evil or infidelity ruling and the victorious Arab armies at the time, or in other words it can be said that the conversion of the inhabitants of those regions to Islam was a result of the war and not a prelude to it, the fondness of religion was not the cause of Islamization, according to the theory of Ibn Khaldun, who said “the defeated is fond – in the consciousness and unconscious – the tradition of the majority” The real reason was panic and fear of swords and was not fondness for the Bedouin civilization.

In those regions and states, the ruins of the old administrations were established by the Arab administrations of the Bedouin certain by the center, and subordinate to it and receive orders from it, the military and the management of its main task was to subjugate the peoples of the occupied region and attach it to the center, and then collect the abscess and send it to the house of the money of the Arab Caliph Al-Quraishi, and the question that must be answered when we are at the beginning of the third millennium: Can or should the standards of the current time distinguish between the conquest and the occupation?? If this is possible and we can consider this a real conquest – in the sense of an act that he commands and urges religion or a desirable act that the people of the open territories wish in their consciousness or unconsciousness, why stop the conquest, which is a desirable and desired action of non-Muslims eager for salvation, justice, peace and Islam, which God has blessed them with only others?

The diligent will say that the reason for the cessation of the conquests returned to the dispersal of the word of the Arabs and Muslims and their rivalry and the weakness of their faith and their distance from their religion and the helplessness of their leaders, etc. Assuming the conquests again in light of new data carried by the unseen and dream of some, will the new conquerors be able to justify this to any of the nations of the earth in some way? Even if it is really aimed at spreading religion, justice, virtue, peace and Islam …!!!

There are still understanding and glorification of the conquests present in the brains of some, there are those in this era who does not consider the invasion of the Arabs of the island an occupation, but a clear conquest and a representative of the will of the divine, and did God really want the bankruptcy and extinction of the homelands under the Arab administration – Islamic – Ottoman, and why was God evil in this way? , The conquests in the countries and open regions have created a category foreign to the current homelands as Syria, and strange to the interests of these new homelands, from these categories, for example, the Syrian Ottomans and then the Arab Arabs, who were interested in the occupation of Turkey to Syria and helped Turkey in the process of occupying parts of Syria, these claim that they are Syrians, like them, who welcomed the occupation of the Arabs of the island for what they call Syria or his country, the occupation of the Syrian, not a stranger, the citizen of Syria, the citizen of Syria, who is a citizen of Syria, who is a citizen of Syria, who is a citizen of Syria.

Occupation or colonialism is not an option, and does not justify the civilization of the Bedouin of the island, which promotes the madmen and the mentally absent to it, the occupation of Syria, no matter how superior the civilization of the Bedouin of the island over the civilizations of the whole world, regarding civilization and civilization Syria did not represent the land and the people of that absent from civilization in general, who roams in Syria sees a lot of evidence of the Syrian civilization, and who roams in Saudi Arabia or in Anatolia does not see anything like this, so it does not make sense to justify the occupation of Syria by Slim I or Khalid Ibn Al-Walid the need to raise the level of Syria civilizationally, justification for liberation and preparation fell and replace a colonizer with another worse fell also!.

The Bedouin did not liberate, but colonized civilized areas with the intention of looting them, and does that liberation apply to Persia, Spain, Sindh and India? And from which colonizer liberated the Bedouin of the island those areas?, Then the Arabs justified the conquests by the fact that the population of Syria is of Arab ethnic origin, is the fact that the Syrians of Arab origins are justified for the occupation of their country by the Arab Bedouin of the Arabian Peninsula? Hello and easy in the Arabs, whatever they are and whatever they are, the Bedouin island is closer to us than Phoenician Ugarit, and the interest of Khalid Ibn Al-Waleed and Omar Ibn Al-Khattab is more important than the interest of Zenobia and the interest of Hamou Rabi, we are Arabs before we are Syrians, and between our interests and the Bedouin interest there is a complete match, we want to occupy our country as occupied by Ibn Al-Walid and we want to colonize our homelands as we colonized Ibn Al-Walid and pay tribute and we are small !!!.

There were many opportunities and occasions, which allowed the fifth queues to naturalize Syria and move away from the alienation of Arabism and political Islam, but the queues insisted on labor and the betrayal of the homelands and the practice of internal colonialism, the queues of betrayal did not accommodate the end of the Ottoman era and the end of the Arab era, and did not understand the concept of historical axiom, which confirms the nihilism of the Arab and Islamic political endeavors in Syria, as a result will eliminate the Ottoman tails and the Arab tails, it is only a matter of time!