The overwhelming advantage and the necessity of feigning weakness before gaining power

Mira Al-Bitar, Osman Ly:

المرزوقي... فارسٌ عربي من نوعٍ آخر      The muslim Brotherhood is inflated by the concept of overwhelming majority, meaning 80% of the country’s population! What are the implications of this 80%? And who are these 80%? Undoubtedly, they are believers of a certain sect, These people want a religious state and welcome elections and ballot boxes before the establishment of this state, They know in advance that there is one unified, believing bloc comprising 80% of the country’s population, So why hold elections then? It suffices to refer to the civil registry records of the registrar, who gives the statec  the true percentages for each sect, Believers have always constituted more than 50% of the population numerically, so they are considered an overwhelming majority and hold the seat of power, For how long? Until the demographic situation changes and believers become a minority, then it will be the turn of others. And so things proceed democratically according to the system of overwhelming majority.

There are many questions in this regard, The first question is, do the Muslim Brotherhood believers differ from others in terms of morals, upbringing, honesty, political experience, and so on? That is, do they consider themselves better than the defeated others? The answer here will be deceptive and will be as follows: The dominant majority does not differ from others. But the real answer is in the mind of the 80% who are different, The dominant majority are the true believers, and the believer is not equal to the disbeliever, This is what Ibn Abdullah says, and this is what the Sunnah says clearly.

As long as the dominant majority represents the true religion, their rule will be a true religious one, This means rejecting the concept of the homeland, for the homeland is an idol! This also means no secularism, and it means Sharia law, and it means the ruler’s responsibility before God, and even the ruler’s appointment is done by the Creator, All of this negates any need for elections, However, the demand for elections has another background; it is a pretense until power is gained, and after power, every event will have its own story.

The second question is, how long will the majority rule? Is there any hope that others will rule, man?! They constitute 80% and you ask how long?! Forever!!! And for the people of what is called Jesus or Moses, for example, to reach power, they need at least 5000 years and complete dedication to procreation, and even polygamy, and each of them must have at least 1000 children like Moulay Al-Maghribi, who had more than 1500 children, then their percentage will change from 5% to 55%, and then they will rule after about 5000 years, This is democracy and one of the most wonderful forms of democracy, which does not need elections, as the records of the civil registry are sufficient!!!!

The answer to the third question will undoubtedly be reassuring, we think that the creatures of the 80% have a set of reasons that confirm the superiority of the dominant human being in the practice of governance, and confirm his clean hands and his keenness to practice social justice as is the case in many brilliant countries, the first of which are the Arab countries, then Afghanistan, Somalia, Mars, Gaza, and many other countries that our lack of knowledge did not allow us to mention, and mentioning them is one of the duties of the creatures of the 80%, perhaps he will be kind and remind us of what our intelligence was unable to grasp, We think that he will not withhold from us any knowledge or information that increases our reassurance.

The fourth question is a curious one: What economic system will the 80% group operate under? The group is confident that God provides for whomever He wills and that He will manage the matter of fodder in the Emirate of the 80%, and the Afghan example confirms this, Then there is another question about how the Emirate or State of the 80% will deal with homosexuals, lesbians, communists, Syrian nationalists, Nasserists, liberals, capitalists, Kurds, Ismailis, Circassians, Yazidis, Druze, Syriacs, Assyrians, etc. Will there be freedom of thought in this state? For example, for a person to think existentially or atheistically, and what are the consequences of that? We must know this from them before we start drawing conclusions and pledging allegiance.

There is a question about the ability of the 80% state to harmonize with the global order, globalization, and the United Nations, Can this state adhere to international norms and laws? For example, regarding education and educational programs overseen by UNICEF, memorization of texts is rejected as a form of education. What about jihad, which is considered fundamental in the minds of the dominant group? What is the 80% state’s stance on loyalty and disavowal, and on the abode of war as defined by Ibn Taymiyyah? How will the concept of sovereignty be implemented? Is the 80% state concerned with the inviolability of the lives and property of non-believers? There are indeed dozens of questions that must be clarified before pledging allegiance to this state, How we wish the 80% group would explain and clarify what the future will be like under the care of trustworthy and faithful hands from within the 80% group!

See less

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *