The Al Mahdi Nasrallah

 Osman Ly, M. Bitar:

 
يجب قطع ايادي ولي الفقيه الجائر والمتعدي في المنطقة - المجلس الوطني للمقاومة الإيرانية      Nasrallah and his deputy Naim Qassem did not leave any occasion except to employ it in the case of the velayat-e faqih, which we should not ignore and turn a blind eye to, because it is a deadly and destructive nonsense and a sabotage of the homelands, which Nasrallah and Hezbollah tried to change its structure and direction as Lebanon, it is logical and expected that a person of this era will reject what Nasrallah wanted and what Nasrallah wanted to impose on the peoples, most of the Lebanese rejected Nasrallah and his wars, and there is no foreign left for the ruler of the jurist, there is a rejection and global criminalization of Nasrallah and his party, so they were put on the lists of terrorism, in addition to placing the Iranian Revolutionary Guards on the lists of terrorism, and then imposed strict economic sanctions on Iran, especially recently, all led to the destruction of the Iranian economy, now 90% of the Iranians live under the poverty line.
Hezbollah and Nasrallah lost all those who supported them, and the last of them was Bashar al-Assad, who was rejected more than them, and Iran, which is universally rejected, is more than them, and now it is in the last rattle before death, the situation for Hezbollah and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards has become very difficult, what to do in this case?
In this case, the remnants of Hezbollah have nothing but to go internally and shed its terror on the Lebanese, after Israel destroyed Nasrallah and Hezbollah, the feelings of the followers of Hezbollah in the Wilayat of the Faqih are no longer useful and influential, originally the herd of followers does not know enough, and if the herd realized the truth of the Wilayat al-Faqih to stay away from Hezbollah and Nasrallah, in practice very few in Lebanon and outside Lebanon who want the guardianship of the jurist and the nonsense of the awaited Mahdi.
The establishment of the state of the jurist in Lebanon, which has no geographical border, and which is ruled by the Mahdi, the owner of the time, is nothing but the chatter of his abstinence, there is no state in this era for a borderless state such as the internationalist caliphate, and there is no president or king named Mahdi, and there is no people or state except for Iran ruled by an Iranian representative of the absent and expected jurist, all these perceptions regarding the ruler of the jurist is fairy and a sign of the loss of reason.
Hezbollah tried to cancel the few civil monuments of the Lebanese state, but the developments indicated that there is no fear for those civilian monuments in Lebanon, Lebanon, regardless of the projects of Hezbollah and its general secretaries from Nasrallah to Naim Qassim, will not become the mandate of the jurist and will not be ruled by the expected Mahdi, the right concept of the jurist in Lebanon as a huge amount of damage and destruction, which the state sits on and will remain sitting on for an unknown period, after sitting for a relatively long time on the reconstruction and relative prosperity.
They say that Al-Mustafa is the amount of the holy law and the trustee to implement it and determine the path of the nation in the direction set by the revelation, after Al-Mustafa came the infallible imams, who have the required mandate to apply the Sharia in private and public life, the guardianship of the jurist represents a continuation of the mandate of Ibn Abdullah and the imams in the exercise of the role entrusted to them, the guardian is the deputy imam, or takes his place in the tasks required of the legitimate leadership of the nation.
It is theoretically clear that the size of the powers entrusted to the Wali al-Faqih is large, he is faithful to the application of the provisions of Muhammad and the supervision of the religious system, and the adoption of major political decisions on the interests of the nation, who has the power of the decision of war and peace, and bears the responsibility for the security of people and their money and their symptoms in determining the general provisions to be followed and monitor their implementation, and the disposal of legitimate funds from Zakat and five and others according to his desire and opinion, and who determines the controls of the state if it is committed to the provisions of legitimacy and take into account the interests of its citizens in line with the provisions of the religion.
The entity of the jurist is not related to the civil state or with the concept of the state in general, the entity of the ruler of the jurist does not recognize the homelands and citizens only religious affiliation, and there is no importance because this believer is an Iraqi or Yemeni or French or otherwise, the association with the mandate includes all taxpayers, even when they belong to another reference, because the Amiriya in the general religious march in the hands of the guardian of the jurist, and there is no fear of conflict with the livelihood of the taxpayers in different countries, the limits set by the jurist take into account two issues, the first is the application of the provisions of Sharia and not to do what is contrary to them, the second objective circumstances and the specificities of each group or country, which affect the circle of commissioning and the area of interest, Hezbollah’s commitment to the mandate of the jurist represents a link in this series.

With these passages, which are quoted from his book, “Hezbollah Method.. The experience. The future “Explained by the current Secretary-General of Hezbollah, Sheikh Naim Qasim, the guardianship of the jurist, and the example of Imam Khomeini, who developed his view of the mandate of the jurist, and became for Iran and the nation of the mullahs wherever they found a religious reference decided on the matters of their private and public life according to the Sharia wherever they were, Hassan Nasrallah considered the ruler of the jurist the actual ruler of all the countries of the believers, Nasrallah said, “Regarding the validity of the guardianship of the jurist in appointing the rulers and giving them the Sharia and legitimacy in all the faithful countries, because his mandate is not limited to geographical borders, his mandate extends with the extension of the presence of believers.”

See less

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *