M. Bitar, Ruba Mansour:
The conspiracy, or rather the concept of conspiracy, is not a theory or a hypothesis, but rather a forced, apologetic, and simplistic interpretation that is attached to the natural manifestations of social, political, military, and cultural practices locally and globally, The concept of conspiracy is the sole offspring of the concept of determinism and the concept of the “historical condition ”, The historical condition is represented in most cases by the existence of a political or religious superstructure that wants to survive despite its inability to possess the right to survive!Zaghloul El-Naggar, the self-proclaimed expert on scientific miracles in religious texts, enjoys considerable popularity, Through the trade of his camel-based remedies, he has amassed an unimaginable fortune—more than six billion dollars. If there is miracle in religious texts, then there is also miracle in the concept of conspiracy, The very invention of the conspiracy concept is like splitting an atom by Zaghloul El-Naggar’s miracle, The miracle in religious texts has enabled him to explain all scientific phenomena and problems, without being able to practically benefit from these discoveries. Conspiracy explains all aspects of defeat, setback, and collapse, and it does not concern itself with inherent weakness, as it does not exist. Concealing weakness is the miracle in conspiracy, and concealing backwardness is the miracle in El-Naggar’s miraculous logic, Every health problem is curable with camel urine, and every political, military, or economic setback is positively resolved by the concept of conspiracy, Can’t it be said that what pertains to conspiracy is almost the same as what pertains to camel urine?
Regarding camel urine, Mrs. Ayat Arabi summarized the matter of camel urine, where she wrote, “Secularists and other enemies of the true religion, who drink the urine of orientalists, like to attack the religion through the hadith of healing with camel urine.”
Why do some people consider attacking camel urine to be an attack on religion? Is the attack on camel urine intended as a deterrent against its use? Is it permissible to promote camel urine as medicine in this century, or in previous centuries, or even before? Does promoting camel urine represent a victory for the religion, given that it is mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari and Muslim, on the authority of Anas ibn Malik, who said: “A group from Uraynah and Ukl came to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and found the climate of Medina unsuitable. They complained to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, and he said: ‘If you go out to the camels of charity and drink their urine and milk…’ So they did, and when they recovered, they attacked the shepherds and killed them, drove off the camels, and waged war against God and His Messenger, So the Messenger of God, peace and blessings be upon him, sent men after them, and they were captured. Their hands and feet were cut off, their eyes were gouged out, and they were left in the sun until they died ” Is it obligatory to act upon everything that came from the Prophet without question? Is it a logical fallacy to say that drinking camel urine is better than drinking the urine of orientalists or the urine of occupying soldiers? Is the foreign language correct?
Regardless of the status of the prophets and the large number of followers of each of them, it is impossible to take into practice everything they said and advised ,In this era and other eras, one cannot accept anything except what science produces in terms of relative truths. Adherence to the physics and chemistry of texts and to splitting the atom, as Zaghloul El-Naggar and others preached, is nothing but adherence to the past and its sciences and superstitions, which were never valid, Adherence in the way that the writer Ayat Al-Arabi wanted was like leaving this world and resigning from the task of providing some benefit to humanity,The relationship with humanity is not a one-way street. Whoever takes must give, and matters of absolute taking or absolute giving cannot be established for long.
The “conspiracy” system is not a trivial system that has no impact on the developments of political, economic, military and social life, but its status is like camel urine, it has not fulfilled the conditions of a theory, and it is not even a hypothesis, because in a hypothesis there is a rational discussion that turns it into a theory or into falling into the trash bin, The conspiracy system is based on absolute dogmatism that embraces a lot of determinism, surrender and dependency. Humanity will not thrive with the conspiracy system and it will not thrive with camel urine.
See less
,