The patriarchal society, represented by the family and the father, and descended from pastoral Bedouin systems, does not realize the extent of the crime it commits against the girl or child, whose natural space is playing with her companions and friends, in addition to school, As for the males who find pleasure in raping girls, they also have their natural space in mental hospitals, or rather in prisons, These represent an imminent danger to humanity and must be quarantined to prevent their evils.
The hatred of rigid jurisprudence and Bedouin tradition is still directed at the woman as a child as well, at her body and mind, All of these are things that the traditional Bedouin jurisprudential or male mind cannot willingly relinquish, These are the animalistic male privileges that have not changed despite the changing times and are invoked from the mentality of Bedouin pastoral war booty, Everything that the Bedouin obtains by hunting, stealing, extortion by the sword, or by trickery is an acquired right for him, and that child for whom he paid is a right and property for him as war booty, Has it not been said religiously in the legitimization of war booty that it is perfectly permissible to enjoy it? It has also been said religiously that whoever does not think of conquest in his life will die on a branch of hypocrisy!
No religion is accused of barbarity simply because its founder married a six-year-old girl and consummated the marriage when she was nine, at the age of 54, Such events are not uncommon in ancient history, However, some religions have resisted the development of concepts and practices, while others have left the matter to civil law, civil legislators, and ultimately, the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, Judaism, particularly Israel, has not adhered to the marriage of Isaac and Rebekah, and Hinduism did not oppose the civil legislature in 1929 when it established a marriage law setting the minimum age for women at 14 and for men at 18, on the contrary The Iraqi parliament, however, permitted the marriage of underage girls in 2025, and religious figures still promote the validity of the marriage of Ibn Abdullah to nine-year-old Aisha, thus objecting to the minimum age for marriage stipulated in the United Nations Charter and Article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, The accusation of barbarity leveled against Islam stems not only from the story of Aisha but also from its refusal to evolve and adapt, With the provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Charter of the United Nations.
Who wants this marriage? Is it God’s will and decision? Is it the groom or the bride, or does God have no connection to this abomination, nor does the bride’s unfortunate will have anything to do with it? Here, the groom must be accused of being the person who committed the crime, and before the person, his animality must be accused, which is desperately defending his virility that consumes sexual privileges and practices the rape of young girls,The patriarchal society that legitimized rape and enshrined tyranny and the concept of slavery and captivity must be accused.
The ancestors deserved the curse because they used to buy and sell each other like cattle in slave markets, The curse is justified despite the historical context that allowed those practices, The curse is necessary not to draw self-flagellation, but to draw prevention from repeating that in the present time, The curse is considered as a moral pledge not to marry daughters or brothers, or to collect captives, or to acquire women as commodities, two, three, or ten… and that is to the extent that their faith can possess, that is, to the extent that can be seized from the spoils of human war, regardless of the means of capture or hunting, whether by the sword or purchase with money from the slave market or the slave market. The ancestors felt no shame in displaying children, young women, and girls, the spoils of war, naked in the markets to be bought and sold to whoever paid more than the customers,Herein lies the importance of the curse, that is, rejection in the present, for if it were not for this rejection based on modern morality, it would not be possible to condemn what ISIS did to everyone who opposed it or differed from it in faith and belief.
Rejection and condemnation are essential for this era, primarily because our ancestors saw no moral fault in the obscenity, debauchery, and prostitution that were widespread under every tent. Nor did our ancestors find fault in honoring a guest by placing a slave girl at his disposal or gifting him a slave girl whom many of them owned, Even in this era, some sheikhs speak of the legitimate conduct regarding captives, Gathering them is necessary if the host does not know who his guests are, so a captive girl can be placed at his disposal for his amusement, Another sheikh wants to organize campaigns in Europe at a rate of four campaigns a year to hunt down blondes from the yellow-skinned girls, This talk was in 2018, not 1400 years ago, What a shame and disgrace!