As for the need to prolong the chronic and ancient culture of ISIS, as for the need to root out ISIS, there was an international decision to crush ISIS militarily, so there was a war against ISIS, which succeeded in destroying its centrality and regular forces, but the experience with the destruction of the centrality of the heritage, intellectually and ideologically rooted gangs and embraced by popular groups that say that the victory over ISIS can be nothing more than the fragmentation of ISIS, to produce from the crumbs of small ISIS without centralization, micro-ISIS!, And this ISIS continues to operate terrorist as small groups carrying out operations here and there and this is what happened, that is, the practice of the so-called asymmetrical war, which a regular army cannot record a final victory leading to a collective surrender to it, erosion and depletion are one of the most important consequences of this war that may last decades without victory or defeat.
The transformation of the war against ISIS from a semi-orderly war to an asymmetrical war does not represent the only development that can be expected on fragmentation, may generate a unifying activity to collect ISIS scattered, and the new situation will have a new name and new concepts and a new internal structure and a new outward policy, and this emerged in 2014 under the name of the Hazmi current, which turned on all other currents and controlled the legitimate fields, the characteristic of the Hazmi current was what was called the thinking of the chain and the excuse of ignorance, the new ISIS was more brutal and firm, but it was less numerous. .
The destruction or reduction of ISIS is possible, but it is difficult to dry the swamp that it was born and sprouted, especially in a short time, that is, in the near or medium term, ISIS is not only a gang, but the embodiment of chronic and deep concepts in ancient times, has a popular incubator to be underestimated, and has broad tacit and apparent support by many Islamists, especially those who curse it and pretend to reject it,
ISIS did not come and what it could develop into “firmness” for example from nothingness or coincidence, the brutality of ISIS is another facet to face the brutality of authoritarian societies and regimes since four hundred years ago to this day, and it is not a coincidence that ISIS is mainly settled in the countries ruled by the Baath, ISIS is similar to the Baath in many characteristics, the most important of which is the biological formula of the past, both want to revive the controversial past, the talk of the Baath about the revival of heritage and imaginary glory, is nothing but talk about the revival of the old Mohammedan regimes, what the Baath wants to send again was an Islamic par excellence.
ISIS has provided itself with a reference support from the Islamic experiences related to post-immigration events and even from texts, ISIS has imitated and did not invent key things, and even the scene of killing and slaughter was not a new innovation, the new in this scene was the camera only.    
We believe that it is necessary to draw attention to some important points, including the evaluation of the catastrophicity of ISIS exclusively, the disastrity does not lie specifically with the current ISIS, but with the heritage of Daesh in general, which includes the regimes in the region, even the peoples, the savage peoples gave birth to brutal regimes, and gave birth to generations without a horizon or hope and without the culture of freedom, ignorant and ingenuant generations in the humiliation of others and the waste of their dignity and then in the practice of tyranny, all of which is like a fertile ground for the recovery of ISIS, the fact that the origins of ISIS extend to the chest of Islam does not mean its ability to continue until this era, continuity means the availability of a brutal environment that can embrace ISIS, and strengthen the reserve of the human element of ISIS, here the incubating environment has large birth and reproduction.