The language that deserves contempt is the language of the person who deserves contempt, Consider Gaddafi and other tyrants, and consider the language they spoke, It is the language of commonalities between oppressors and the oppressed, and between madmen who speak of rats, germs, infiltrators, scum, sycophants, agents, Salafist, Zionist, American, Qatari, Wahhabi gangs, conspiracies, and the language of the Green Book, etc. The language of deposed leaders like Hosni Mubarak, Bashar al-Assad, and Omar al-Bashir was no less primitive and degrading than Gaddafi’s, and no less so than the language of many social media users, like the one who said regarding Sultan Abdul Hamid’s massacre of the Assyrians, “He didn’t hold back with the Assyrians!” But unfortunately, some of them still howl! Or by describing the dead or the slain enemy as a “carcass”, or by accusing the child Hamza Al-Khatib of trying to take the wives of officers, etc., those who speak this language are primarily the muslim Brotherhood and their ilk, who have monopolized the use of the words hateful, spiteful, infidel, apostate, traitor, etc. These are the ones who promote the killing of the apostate, and who want those who do not belong to their religion to pay the jizya while they are humiliated. These are the ones who want to implement the provisions of the Pact of Omar, which represents the most despicable document known to history.
Obscenity didn’t just sprout from Gaddafi’s tongue; it sprouted on the tongues of almost everyone, It’s almost universal, from a fabricator like Khaled al-Aboud to a criminal like al-Arour to the average person, to Buthaina Shaaban, the revolutionary of the glorious March 8th movement!!!, and the one who said “It’s over” in March 2011. Isn’t saying “It’s over” ridiculous obscenity? Isn’t saying that Assad is “resistant” a lie and hypocrisy? Isn’t calling the 1967 defeat a “setback” deception and ignorance? Isn’t talking about a global war that Assad waged and won against a hundred countries with utter contempt and condescension towards the public? Isn’t Khaled al-Aboud, the proponent of the “squares theory,” saying that it’s a conspiracy against the grandson of Ali ibn Abi Talib and the grandson of Hassan and Hussein despicable, foolish, and obsequious! Likewise, the slave says that angels can split from God, but no soldier can split from Assad’s brigades, According to him, Assad deserves the title of Commander of the Faithful, and according to a fabricated, applauding member of the Assad People’s Assembly, this Assad deserves the title of President of the World, a position he will bequeath to Hafez II, then to Bashar II, and so on! For the noble dynasty to accept this, the Syrians, according to Talib Ibrahim’s wishes, must “kiss” Assad’s boots, Those who refuse are labeled rats, according to Talib Ibrahim, It is logical that the language of the university professor Bassam Abu Abdullah, who bought his professorial credentials from Kazakhstan, would be somewhat more refined, Anyone who rejects the saying, “Wherever you step, we will pray and kiss,” is not a rat, but merely an agent, In addition to all this, there are the vulgar insults that are too obscene to mention,The examples we have presented illustrate a degenerate language that even the most lowly street urchin would be ashamed to use, and whoever speaks it is a street urchin, With all due respect, there is not enough space to mention more than what has been mentioned, so we will be satisfied with this much.
Salafism did not notice the crudeness and depravity of its discourse, nor did it occur to it to ask the following question: Why do some people hate it, or rather reject it? Why does most of the world reject the Brotherhood-affiliated Erdogan? Why does the world fight Salafism? Why does the European Union refuse to provide aid to their groups, as stated by EU representatives, namely the German Foreign Minister and the French Foreign Minister, about a year ago? Aren’t the actions of the Brotherhood and the rest of the followers of Muhammad the reason for the world’s rejection of them?!
We do not wish to dwell on the shameful language spewed by shameless creatures, such as “Assad will remain even if not a single Syrian remains,” or “Assad or we burn the country,” or the factional equivalent of that, “We will burn the country if Assad remains.” Isn’t this Atef Najib’s advice to the families of detained children: “Forget your children and have others, and if you cannot do that, send your women to us, we can impregnate them!”? Can depravity and baseness be greater? Contempt and stupidity have become possible after many of this people have turned into donkeys.
The scientific student and examiner of matters knows from sociolinguistic studies that language and society are two sides of the same coin, and the relationship between them is dialectical, and each expresses the other in some way, The donkey is the one who makes fools of people linguistically, Speech is not merely the result of moving the tongue; speech is an expression of the movement or movement of the mind and of the state of the heart.
When we are ashamed of the language a person speaks, we are ashamed of that person, Language is not a phenomenon confined to form or substance; it is intimately related to society, to its development and its general condition, It serves society and is served by it, and thus it expresses its condition and is expressed by it, It is an effective communication tool and a means of expressing identity without being an identity itself, It is the carrier of culture and knowledge, and the saying “the camel with what it carries” applies to it,It is a social phenomenon and represents the memory of peoples, By projecting the tongue onto the person, it can be said that what happened to Arabic happened to the Arab, Whoever feels ashamed of the Arab person feels ashamed of his language, which blows in our faces a fierce wind and a foul odor carrying stupidity, ignorance, primitivism, and inferiority.