Women and their mental superiority

M. Bitar , Osman Ly :

 Due to the repeated claim that the Arab-Bedouin conquests “liberated us”, without a clear and objectivedefinition of the order of liberation, liberated us from the Romans, but the issue of the Romans was not clear as colonialism, the rule was mutual between Syria and Rome, so that it can be said metaphorically that Rome was attached to Syria, Syrian Rome!, It can be said metaphorically that Syria was attached to Rome, Roman Syria! , The Roman law dealt on an equal footing with the Romans and Syrians and other peoples that were annexed to the Roman Empire by means of occupation, which turned into a partnership, the status of classical colonialism does not apply to the relationship between Syria and Rome, from the Syrians there were at least several caesars in Rome, and there was a caesar  from Libya and another from Yemen, and then that the laws of the Roman Empire did not distinguish in terms of Roman projects and architectures, and even the eastern countries of Syria, the same of the Romans, which is the rank of the Romans, the same, the Romans, the semenorist of the Romans, the stones of the Romans, the same regard, the Romans, and the sensuing of the Romans, the styrem of the Romans, the styant of the Romans, the story of which is the reconquest of the Roman Empire, which turned into a partnership, the Western universe in the seven, the Romans, which is the Romans, the signed the Romans, and the Romans, the sense, the Romans, the Romans, the two countries, the slay, the Romans, the two countries, the two, the two, the two, the two, the two, the other, the Romans, the two, the two, the two, the two, the Romans, the sense, the Romans, the two, the two, the slashore, the Romans, the Romans, which was not distinguished in the Roman projects

Women constitute half of the important and most important society, but women, however, were not treated in patriarchal societies on an equal footing with men. There were large differences in dealing. What is of main interest to us is to shed some light on the status of women in the Roman Empire compared to their status in the Hijaz Arab Empire. Women in ancient Rome, that is, in Syria and the Levant, were of great importance in all aspects of life, They were equal to men. There were sometimes superiorities in Rome, There were no polygamy, The woman was an idol like Ishtar, She was a queen and a head of state, Women took over countries, governments and peoples who succeeded, strengthened and advanced civilizationally spectacularly., We have Zenobia, Mary, Queen Samir Amis, and many others.

The issue of Syrian queens is surprising, we know only  little about them, while the rest of the world knows them well outside the Arab region, Queen Samir Amis has turned into a living legend, the pure queen turned into a symbol of the queen who does not retreat, and who knows from us our Syrian princess in the Phoenician era “Europe”, which gave the European continent its name, and because of it the alphabet, science and knowledge was transferred to Greece through her brother Prince Qadmus, not to forget the Supreme Lady Julia Domna, who was a temple priest, and was able with her political skill to enable her children to sit on the Roman caesar chair, Julia Doumna turned Rome into an annex to Syria, so it is not permissible to talk about Roman colonialism, but about a Syrian-Romanian partnership.

We wanted from the previous lines to prove that women in the Levant had a very prestigious position, and since women make up almost half of society, and since the Bedouin   liberated us, and they have to be thankful, so it must be said that the Bedouin invasion also liberated women, here lies the giant lie, the invader Bedouin did not liberate women, but put them in a cage of tyranny and injustice of Sharia and religion, which despised women in a difficult way.

For 1450 years ago we see a rational commitment to a saying that a nation did not succeed or is a woman, we find a commitment and a commitment to what concerns  polygamy, which did not exist in the Levant 1450 years ago, women have suffered for fourteen centuries of many forms of injustice with a religious doctrinal cover, such as considering a man as a valued on her, and then fighting her by starving through a law that takes away her rights or her rights are not equal to the rights of the male, and in order not to starve her, she accepts any insult before her, who remained in a state of beasts, her testimony is not like the testimony of Ishtar and the testimony of Zenobia and Julia Domna, and Samir Amis, that about credibility is half-strucking or violating her forms of honor, then she is honored, and she is more than violated by her.

The tragedy is more general  , and because the woman is lacking in mind and religion, she may not take care of a people, she must accept to consider it blind, and she must accept her contempt for her because she does not pray during her menstruation, she must accept the saying of the son of Abdullah, “I saw you most of the people of the fire”, she must swallow her likeness to the veil, she must marry her when she “bears the burden”, the wife only to foot!!!, She must accept the man’s possession of the weapon of divorce, and thus put it in an ongoing rank owned, she must accept the distinction between her urine and the urine of the male, jurisprudence “exudes the urine of the male and washes the urine of the female.”

For them, the scholars did not care about the status of women, for them, it was subtlying and dealing with them in the form we know from the history of those last centuries is self-evident, and so far the jurists insist on considering religion as a reinforcement and honor for women, which exists in the presence of traditions and local jurisprudence in the best condition, but the development of the status of giant women in recent centuries, which was twice what happened during thousands of years of human history, exposed the comparison between our situation and their situation, any case of the rest of the world, considering women in this environment in the most sensitive case of great fraud, it is in the worst case, here it can be said that the bad situation is due first to the Bedouin invasion and to the change of religion to the methods of dealing with women within the framework of the so-called Sharia and returns second to the failure of the invasion of “modernity” of the region, here is the confusion of the peoples The source of the source of the province and the survival of the second, the second in the region.

We feel that the question about the relationship of religion to women is objectively wrong, and we believe that the question must be whether the honor of jurisprudence of women or their fairness or their factor as a human being, regardless of the shameful texts, the texts, whatever they are not able to do anything on the ground without the men of jurisprudence, who are the politicians and rulers at the same time, the texts are no more than ink on paper compared to the men of jurisprudence or religion, who are the men of solution and linkage, their interpretations  are contradictory and anti-each, were and still represent their passions and conviction, their passions are forced to adopt those convictions, so the criminality against women is their crime par excellence.