spare us the painful images, showing millions on a journey into the unknown, carrying their personal belongings and their children on their shoulders or lost among the legs, with a look of confusion and regrettable and painful disappointment, They appear to be products of violence, ignorance, and merciless war.

There is no doubt that the sight is not only painful, but also compels us to ask critical questions, What is the motive for bringing all these children into the world, only to leave them to the fate that wars have in store for them? Do their parents not bear some responsibility for the tragedy of these children? Was the instinctive decision to procreate, controlled by sperm and egg, a rational and wise decision, or a wrong one? Is procreation itself a virtue, when those born alive are exposed to death by being killed, dragged, starved, or sick? What is the benefit of random procreation, when early death devours newborns? Only 1.9 out of 1000 newborns die in Luxembourg, compared to the death of more than 50 children in underdeveloped countries.

In terms of results and responsibility, a hot war with cannons and rifles is no different from a cold war that also starves, kills, and displaces, such as the war waged by ignorance against humanity, the war waged by corruption against humanity, and many other wars, Let’s call all of that, cold or hot war a “crisis.” Here, parents must continuously assess the severity of the crisis. Does the crisis allow for procreation as an expression of activity and abundance of eggs and animals? Or should parents assess the situation rationally and classify the crisis in terms of their ability to care for newborns? This is a very different approach in its essence from the absolute advice to procreate at any cost, because the son of Abdullah will be proud of the multiplying people on the Day of Resurrection!

The child is born and remains instinctive until the age of sexual differentiation, that is, until the sixth or seventh spring of life, This is the instinctive stage of human life, immediately followed by what is called the political stage of the child’s life,The word “politics” here does not mean politics in the traditional sense of the word, but rather it means the stage of preparation, evaluation, building and qualification, the stage of refining instincts and enlisting them in the service of man, the stage of humanizing the human being.

The absence of the political stage, as is the case in backward environments, where the school is failing, family education methods are failing, society is failing, and failure is representative of all other aspects of life, if it is permissible to call a deficient human gathering, i.e. a herd of human creatures, a “society,” leads to the survival of the human being or the newborn/newborn in the instinctual stage, due to the loss of the “political” stage, i.e., education, upbringing, and qualification, The extension of the instinctual stage at the expense of the political stage does not take into account the conditions of economic life in the first place, and life is primarily economic, at least from a Marxist point of view, Development based on the loss of the political stage means the perpetuation of animality, so the lack of human civilization means a return to its animal origin.

A person who is not trained to control their instincts is, by definition, an animal, and the proof of this is clear, All peoples with high fertility rates, such as the Syrian fertility rate, which is estimated at 3.4%, are peoples who have no connection whatsoever to the group of developed peoples, Compare the fertility rates of different peoples, and you will find that high fertility is always associated with backwardness, which is not something to be proud of, as Ibn Abdullah said, In fact, it is not permissible to adopt the aforementioned advice in this era, It is most likely that this advice had political and military motives in an era that was beginning to prepare itself for invasions and conquests, The number of warriors in the past was equivalent to the number of swords, and it is not advisable to use the sword in the conquests that believers still dream of in the present, The sword is of no use at all in this era, What can be used in this era is reason and science, The sword is only suitable for suicide.

Why is it not permissible to link fertility and its activity or inactivity with marriage and then its activity or inactivity, which is greatly affected by the economic factor? The matter of marriages is subject to increase or decrease according to economic development,The decrease in material capabilities allocated to meet marital obligations such as housing, food and other things, The motives of many of the procreations in poor areas are not primarily religion, but ignorance and a weak sense of responsibility towards the new human being, who comes with his sustenance according to the opinion of ignorance, as we have not seen until now the arrival of sustenance with the arrival of the child, Ignorance is also responsible for evaluating the saying of Ibn Abdullah: “Procreate and multiply, for I will boast of you on the Day of Resurrection.” And did his boasting of them ever feed bread? Did his boasting save more than 50 children out of 1000 newborns in backward regions compared to the death of 1.9 children in regions that do not belong to the nation of Ibn Abdullah? Despite his boasting about his flock, the rate of newborn deaths reached more than 25 times the rate in infidel Europe.