Samir Sadiq, Ruba Mansoor:
f 
that claim to be keen on preserving a unified Syria with an area of 185 thousand km2, while in reality these practices deepen the tendency towards division, Is the howling of the coastal people under kicking and beating dedicated to keeping Syria with the aforementioned area united and one?! Is shaving the mustaches and beards of the Druze elders dedicated to the tendency towards Syrian unity?! The most horrific were the slaughter, burning, field executions, kidnapping, siege, rape and other animal practices that the dictionary of barbarism has not known recently, Then, is it logical that the defender of Syrian unity would be the first to divide it and establish the so-called Idlib province or emirate
Why do some people feel that partition is a disaster, and that partition will cause the sun to fall to the earth, or the earth will open up to swallow Syria and all the predatory animals on it, or that partitioning Syria will mean the end of the world, and what is the benefit to the Druze in remaining a slave to the Sunni or a slave to the Alawite or other, and the same question is asked by the Alawite and the Kurd and before them the Idlibi asked it to himself, and the result was the establishment of the state of Idlib, which occupied Syria while the state of Syria was unable to occupy Idlib and subject it to the concept of the sacred Syrian unity
The issue is very simple: all the groups mentioned felt that they were internally colonized, meaning that the conditions of citizenship were imbalanced, especially the conditions of equality, social justice, and freedom, etc, There was no central Syrian authority in the last century that was not oppressive, corrupt, and unjust, with the exception of the French quarter-century, where there was a legal situation that was not ideal, but it was better than all the types of self-rule that Syria and the Syrian people experienced during the last century, This recognition is very dangerous and has disastrous implications regarding the ability of a people to govern itself, that is, regarding its independence, considering that “independence” theoretically, practically, and legally is the natural form of life for peoples, However, it seems that the Syrians are no longer normal, and what the Algerian philosopher Malek Bennabi wrote about the issue of the necessity of colonization applies to them
The strangest forms of self-rule were Nasserist rule and his High Commissioner in Syria or the northern country, Abdul Hamid al-Sarraj, Abdul Nasser came riding the mule of unity and left on the mule of secession after less than four years, Nasserism did not only eliminate what was called the United Arab Republic, but it also eliminated the idea of unity in general, Perhaps Nasserism did not deliberately eliminate the unity thought, and perhaps this hypothetical unity thought was dead before its birth, meaning that there was no real unity “thought,” but rather unity hallucinations that dominated the originally atrophied political mind of Abdul Nasser and other utilitarian Baathists, If the minds of the masses were not damaged, Abdul Nasser would not have been able to carry out the destructive role he played wearing the shirt of salvational “unity.” Uthman had preceded him in wearing the shirts, and the result was war and fragmentation.
Among the signs of failure is when people allow history to repeat itself, especially in negative aspects and events, rumination Negative history is evidence of the shortcomings of peoples in the field of “learning”, Those who adopt Arabism do not learn because they consider themselves teachers of humanity, as claimed about a year ago by a former Jordanian muslim Brotherhood minister (Mohammed Al-Qudah) that Arabists were created to guide other peoples, not to manufacture airplanes, trains, etc., and as some refugees in the West claim, that God imposed on Europeans to serve the refugees
We do not know a good reason to consider unity a salvation matter, that is, the independence of what is considered parts means death, and the unification of parts means salvation from death. Many countries have been divided, such as Sudan, which separated from Egypt in the early era of the Arab unionist Abdel Nasser, then its south separated from its north and did not disappear or die, Then, the relationship of southern Sudan with the north is now good, The same thing is observed after the separation of East Timor from Indonesia, and Indonesia did not disappear or die, Yugoslavia was divided into three countries and did not disappear or die, Did the cancellation of the Syrian-Egyptian unity lead to the disappearance and death of Syria or Egypt? Germany was divided into East and West, and there was no catastrophe, Czechoslovakia was divided, and the earth did not shake, Rather, there is a renaissance in both parts of Czechoslovakia, In the three countries that were born by caesarean section from the womb of Yugoslavia, there is stability and a renaissance, and the relationship between the parts is no longer characterized by With mutual slaughter, these sections even became members of the European Union, In general, it cannot be said that there is a unity of salvation, nor can it be said that there are sacred borders,
Borders are not sacred, and reality proves in various parts of the world that they are subject to change, Syria’s geographical borders were not the result of a stable cultural or historical identity, and there are no eternal borders, but rather borders that change over long or short periods according to the requirements of the stage, which includes the creation of new entities or even the deletion of entities that are no longer necessary, or have become a threat to some other entities and countries, especially countries that have the political, military or economic ability to change them, The sanctification of the Syrian borders has not been able to fortify them, Here is Israel drawing its borders by military force, and Turkey has done nothing else with the borders, Then there are some Syrians who welcome changing the borders in favor of Turkey, and there are Syrians who want to abolish the borders in favor of Turkey or whatever Turkey deems necessary to protect its security,
It is difficult to understand the issue of the sanctity of borders when Syrians participate with Erdogan in his occupation of a relatively large Syrian border strip, Therefore, some of the slogans that some people raise can be considered false and fabricated. This matter is proven by the development of many regions of the world, which have known the ability of borders to change, meaning the creation of new entities or the abolition of existing one
Post Views: 379
