There are voices screaming and shouting against sedition. Was the intention really to av what called “sedition,” or is it something else??? Everyone knows how many linings there are in the shirt of Dhu al-Noorayn Uthman and his great sedition. The call to avoid “sedition” in the past and in the future was always lined with several linings. The first lining was a call from one party to the other to surrender, otherwise “sedition” would occur, which would burn everything green and dry. The second lining was the emphasis that the efforts of those causing “sedition” were unsuccessful, and there was no hope of their success in their aims, meaning that the victory in the end was not for those causing “sedition.” As for the third lining, it was a defamatory lining, meaning that the one causing the sedition was accused of committing an evil act that was not in line with morality, Sharia, and truth. There might be a fourth lining, represented by the call to maintain the situation almost as it is. It is from the generosity of the morals of those calling for avoiding sedition that they bestow some crumbs on the “hypothetical” cause of sedition so that they can rest and relax. All of that aimed to score positive points in favor of those calling for avoiding sedition. All of that was an arrangement. Tactical, its strategy is to defeat the opponent without much effort or losses.
The occurrence of “sedition” turns the voice of prohibition into the whip of dawn, and the world rises and does not sit down except by destroying the parties of sedition by each other or by one of the parties. There are special religious groups, which want to fight to the last drop of their blood for the sake of belief, and in this case we cannot deny the possibility of an increase in the number of participants in the fight of sedition, as is happening now in Sweida, and as happened on the coast or will happen in the east-north of Syria. The wars of sedition may lead to the division of the country or turning it into ashes. Most of what was mentioned has already happened in many parts of the region between the ocean and the Gulf.
We return to the strife, and we admit the difficulty of analyzing or understanding it, and we do not know for sure who will win and who will be defeated, but whoever uses it to justify his aggression against the other will lose something, and thus there is no victor in the strife. The previous regime in Syria justified the abuse of others by avoiding strife, so it committed crimes, and its crimes led to its humiliating end. Before its end, it failed to create a bright Syrian history in terms of its freedom, justice, civility, integrity, cleanliness, and independence, which set the country back absolutely. The delay was manifested in the impoverishment and starvation of the human being, the squandering of his dignity, and the theft of his country’s resources, then turning his country into a farm that was canonized in the name of the royal family for everything, then sharing the farm’s revenue with his henchmen. All of that is like a time bomb whose explosion was delayed, but it did explode. The delay in the explosion gave the authority the impression that eternity is possible and necessary, and if it is not possible in the republican form, then let it be in the royal form or in the form of a mixture of the royal and the republic, i.e. The “camel-like” form, as former Tunisian President Moncef Marzouki put it, practically transformed Bashar into a “camel-like” president, and he did not feel any problem with that, because he believed his lie that 99% of the people gave him confidence in a referendum that he saw as very, very clean, and one of his mercenaries called it “the wedding of democracy”!
The word “sedition” is ambiguous and carries within it a lot of flaws and complexity. It is a code name for a tactic aimed at maintaining power or reaching power, i.e. a name for the fact of the struggle for power. Within the folds of this name and its justifications, most of the features of the clownish Machiavellianism are concentrated. The emergency law that lasted for about half a century in Syria, was the longest state of emergency known to human history. It was to prevent sedition! Spreading corruption was to avoid sedition. Monopolizing the army leadership and transforming the army into an ideological Baathist army and finally into a division dedicated to protecting the family was to avoid sedition. The inheritance and changing the constitution within minutes to hybridize Omar, the heir to power, Bashar, was to avoid sedition. There is no sin in this country that was not intended to avoid sedition. A wise person can conclude that all the aforementioned anomalies, sins and criminal practices were not intended to avoid sedition, but rather to cause it. They are in and of themselves “sedition.”
Bashar left and al-Jolani came as the editor-in-chief! He began his editorial with the massacres that no sooner die down in one area than they revive in another. From the coast to the south and east, he is waiting. Practically, there are seditions in all four corners of the country. What distinguishes Bashar from al-Jolani was the successor’s ability to outperform the predecessor in all the points that we hated and rejected in the predecessor. The beginning of the predecessor in the year 2000 was promising, but its clouds quickly cleared and ugliness appeared in an ugly way. The successor began slaughtering without clouds and without a galabiya and turban. He began slaughtering in a formal suit and a suitable tie as an alternative to the jihadi leash, which he was bound with to commit the crimes of slaughter in at least three human slaughterhouses, including the al-Qaeda slaughterhouse, then the ISIS slaughterhouse, then al-Nusra, and now the Editorial and Reporting Authority.
Al-Julani took the editorial decision based on the Almighty’s saying, “Persecution is worse than killing.” Therefore, killing in the coast and the south was to avoid the worst, i.e., strife. And suppressing strife was more important than the catastrophe of killing, slaughter, and genocide. In other words, killing is not strife!!!!! How does strife really appear and what is its content?
Sedition appears in many forms and meanings, including polytheism, which is considered worse than murder. What are the implications of polytheism? In short, it can be said that polytheism is associating others with God in worship, including fasting, prayer, etc. The concept of polytheism applies to polytheists, that is, to everyone who differs from believers in their religious orientations, either in the core of faith, such as atheism, for example, or in the practices of the believer, such as fasting, prayer, hijab, etc.
The polytheist is the one who is different, and therefore his mere presence next to the monotheistic believer is a cause for strife. Since strife is worse than killing, then to killing, O believers!!! How many people must be killed in the world to avoid strife? The answer lies with God and Al-Jolani! We expect his answer to include an emphasis on the impossibility of pluralism in this country to avoid strife!
