Some people in this miserable East insist on describing or defining sexual life, which is not based on religious rules and foundations, as a licentious sexual life, and that women then become a common object, The one accused of licentiousness and the common object here is sexual life in most parts of the world, especially in Europe!

There is a deliberate logical fallacy in this view, Sexual life in Europe is not pornographic and women are not common property, Rather, there is sexual freedom, Sexual freedom does not mean pornography at all, but rather it means achieving the love that transforms reproductive life into its highest forms and practice, The love that accompanies reproductive life is like the cancellation of pornography, Whoever knows Europe recognizes sexual practices between a male and a female who love each other, agree with each other, and practice refined sex with each other, This love that precedes reproductive life is what raises reproductive life from its level located in the space of the reproductive organs to a vital, human, social level, represented in unity with the other, out of desire, willingness, and love, then acceptance of the other and voluntary, willful interaction with him. Voluntary, loving reproductive life is a form of healthy social life by other means!

If we move to the Middle Eastern societies, where reproductive activity is concentrated exclusively in the organs, and where limited mixing prevents the establishment of acquaintance and familiarity prior to sexual activity, reaching the stage of reproductive activity or sexual activity is subject to conversations, agreements and negotiations, most of which are related to the material aspect, such as the dowry, the advance payment and the deferred payment, the possibility of concluding an agreement to practice reproductive life within the framework of marriage with one of many parties, and the choice of party in this bazaar is subject mainly to material factors, as limited mixing does not allow for the practice of love and familiarity in advance,Sexual life begins as soon as the material aspects are agreed upon, and the agreement is usually between the woman’s representative and the man concerned with concluding the marriage agreement, Subjecting the agreement to the material factor means making the material permissible to the decision of who with whom! Here, this sexual relationship can and should be defined as an obscene relationship, as whoever pays more gets the woman, it is obscene! Because the factor that determines her status is material and not personal, this means turning women into something subject to the rules of supply and demand, that is, she is transformed into a commodity!

Objectifying a human being means reducing him to the status of a thing that is bought and sold. Objectification is a nihilistic, contemptuous concept, If it was practiced by large segments of humanity, the human being would cease to exist,Objectification is a shameful, humiliating, reprehensible and rejected concept, Who is accused in this country of reducing women to a thing that is bought and sold, i.e. a consumer product? Is it a love relationship that precedes the reproductive stage or is it the agreement that defines and unites the parties signing the marriage contract?!

Most of the dealings with the reproductive issue are subject to the size of the “ego”. Guardianship over women until marriage and the conclusion of the marriage contract hinders the ego from reaching the natural size possible in terms of independence, and thus making decisions stemming from personal inclinations and desires. Therefore, the “ego” of women is atrophied in the societies of this region founded on the religious patriarchal male system, The atrophy of the female ego means weakness and lack of resistance, Therefore, the state of atrophy and weakness of the ego allows the marriage contract to swallow this “ego”. The enormity of the ego means the opposite, The enormity of the ego does not allow this “ego” to be swallowed by what is outside the ego, Thus, the will turns into a marriage contract, while the weakness of the ego means a contract without will, The will is taken away by the patriarchal system that exercises guardianship, Coincidences sometimes allow the contract to develop into will,When the woman is able, after the contract, to develop the relationship of the contract into love, then from the womb of the contract love is born, and these are rare, exceptional cases, The original is that the contract is born from the womb of love, to form One body, harmonious in love and integrated, a body with harmonious functions and a unified entity!

The establishment of marriage on love following acquaintance, and thus the establishment of procreation on love, represents a categorical denial of pornography, which means multiple sexual partners, where the man or woman has sex with many parties, as was the case in the animal Stone Age, The biggest source of pornography is the marital home imposed without love, The hated man practices a type of sex, which is in fact rape legalized by contract. The wife of the contract logically seeks a voluntary dictate for her sexual life, and practices this sexual life with another alongside her forced contractual sexual life,This is a form of sexual permissiveness familiar and known in backward, conservative circles, for example in the Middle East!

The common woman is the common man who seeks the woman in common for the purpose of practicing animal sex, not human sex with her, The common dimension of the male requires the construction of fortresses to protect the woman from the animalization of the one seeking sex, or more precisely, the one seeking vulva. Protection turns into a form of ownership that is consistent with the mentality of the patriarchal male society that nationalizes women, The problem of the common woman in practice is the problem of the common man, and the problem lies in the man who targets her,The clearest examples of commonality are the matter of captivity in wars and the piling up of female slaves in numbers that sometimes reached many thousands, for example in the palaces of the Rashid Caliph.

Pornography is represented by the gang rape of women by the Mujahideen, as embodied by ISIS Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, here in many cases women were gang raped, then the women were distributed to the men of the Caliphate like candy, this method does not exist in general in Europe, which is represented in a descriptive way by the mentality of the captives of war and concubines, the descriptive way of pornography and the common, which is falsely stuck on women is the case of the captive Safiyya bint Huyayy who was turned into one of the harem of Ibn Abdullah after the slaughter of her husband, father, brother and people, especially the common and pornographic are male par excellence!!!