Bedouin locusts and decadence
Ma Bitar, Mamdouh Bitar:
What did the conquerors bring with them when they arrived in the Levant, Egypt, and elsewhere? Did they have a book, a religious man, a language, science, culture, philosophy, etc.? They had nothing in their hands but the sword and the concept of “I have come to you to slaughter”, followed by the principle of “Submit and you will be safe”, or “Pay the tribute and you will be humiliated and by hand”, or “Fight”, where you will certainly be slaughtered. What do we expect from a conquering colonizer of this cave type compared to the French invasion of Egypt, which was accompanied by many scholars who deciphered the secrets of the hieroglyphic language, then brought the printing press and other such things? Of course, all of this was not for the sake of the Egyptians’ , but rather for a personal benefit, or rather for a civilizational concept mixed with occupation.
Egypt advanced at the hands of the printing press and benefited from the French presence in some way, even if thebenefit was partial.
What did Egypt benefit from Amr ibn al-As, who discovered that Egyptian women were playful, that Egyptians were united by the drum and divided by the stick, and that he had to raise the level of Egyptian “tax” by orders of the foolish Caliph Omar? There was no benefit, there was only harm, crime and primitiveness, which over time managed to take root in the concious of people, .
One of the worst results of the Bedouin invasion was that stagnation in all aspects of life. There is no difference between the stagnation caused by the Ottoman colonialism and the stagnation caused by the colonization of the Bedouin ,.
Before the era of free social communication, peoples’ interaction with history was deficient. When we encounter any colonialism now, we denounce and deplore it, and we know that its primary mission was not the interests of the colonies. Arab nationalists and the muslim Brotherhood are an exception to this rule, as they consider the Bedouin occupation a clear conquest that must be celebrated and commemorated, to the point of glorifying its symbols, such as naming mosques, schools, and others after the symbols of the invaders, i.e., the Caliphate and its military leaders. This is based on Arab Brotherhood-based concepts such as the concept of loyalty and disavowal, which focuses on the religious nation and not the earthly homeland. Rather, it fights the earthly homeland, because the international religion is like a “homeland.” The matter is not limited to the abolition of homelands that were formed according to modern concepts, but rather the abolition has expanded to include the family, as the importance of religion has become much greater than the importance of the mother, father, son, or wife. When a son abandons religion, he is killed, even by his father. Religion was the basis of all this crime and madness.
All of this and much more, such as the violation of homelands and the destruction of social relationships such as motherhood, indicates that a civilization born 1400 years ago, and which was rich and great according to their false claims, vanished in an age of digging, excavation and uncovering the hidden. A rotting corpse has been identified that was hidden behind lies and illusions, graves filled with the garbage of vices, scandals, backwardness and stagnation, and thus a cause for ridicule and not for pride.
The invasion of Egypt and the invasion of the Levant were carried out by savages carrying swords. We have not heard anything about the books they wrote or the ideas they created. They were illiterate, including Ibn Abdullah. They did not add anything to the civilization of the Levant or the civilization of Egypt or others. Rather, they demolished what the ancients had built in Egypt and the Levant, even some of the pyramids. The same applies to the rest of the conquered areas, which were taken over by the invaders, as they took possession of other spoils of war, such as captives, concubines, property, and everything available, such as money in the form of a tribute that the living had to pay, humiliated. Rather, the living had to pay the tribute for the dead in Egypt.
It was a complete violation of people and stones, without any knowledge of managing the bureaus and records related to money and spoils. Here, they sought help from the Copts in Egypt and from the Syriacs in the Levant. Conquest and the accumulation of spoils of war cannot be considered “civilization” or “liberation,” as the peoples of the conquered regions were not culturally inferior. Neither the Egyptians nor the Syrians needed to learn anything civilized from the invaders, except for the manner of using the sword, followed by captivity and theft, which represented the primary goal for them. The Syrian and Egyptian farmers remained behind their plows, and over time, even agriculture disappeared, and nothing new was invented.
Even the Bedouin invaders failed to learn from the civilizations of the peoples they were afflicted with. The Roman and Pharaonic Egyptian monuments remained towering, defying time. The barbarism of the Bedouin locusts was not limited to their failure to advance or learn from civilized peoples; rather, their barbarism was keen to stimulate backwardness. Thus, the barbaric military level of the Bedouins was somewhat balanced by the level of civilization of the conquered countries. To weaken the level of civilization, the Bedouin locusts resorted to deliberate destruction. Saladin destroyed many pyramids, and the Brotherhood is still determined to destroy the pyramids. The Bedouins did nothing else. In the Levant, the destruction was not limited to the era of conquests, but rather it extended beyond that to the current era, for example, primarily at the hands of ISIS. Before ISIS, the muslim Brotherhood practiced this, and before the Brotherhood, the Ottomans practiced this matter. It is not permissible to attribute a civilization to anyone other than those who made it. The Pharaonic civilization was made by the Pharaohs, i.e. the ancient Egyptians. The Mesopotamian civilization was made by the Arameans, Syriacs, and Chaldeans. The Mayan civilization was made by the Mayan peoples. What did the Bedouins make? What books did they write, what buildings did they construct, what laws did they enact, and what cultural works did they practice? There were no arts, philosophy, or sciences in religion. Drawing was forbidden, photography was forbidden, theater was forbidden, and even the establishment of libraries was forbidden. The printing press was forbidden, with the exception of beards that reached the knees, then prayer and the practice of fornication. In its various animalistic and rapist forms, killing and slaughtering for the most trivial reasons was welcomed, as if it were a type of worship.
When we discuss or evaluate any colonial invasion, ancient or modern, we denounce, condemn and find it ugly, because it represents exploitative ambitions with barbaric and savage means. However, the Arabists and the muslimBrotherhood do not consider the Bedouin locust invasion to be colonialism, but rather a clear conquest. They praise it and do not hesitate to hold celebrations in its memory. They even named schools, streets and mosques after criminals such as Saladin, Ibn al-Walid or Uqba ibn Nafi’ to commemorate them. All of this proves that the Arabists and the Brotherhood do not know the truth about the Bedouin locust invasion, or that they know it, but they want to employ the indoctrination of glorification in… Facilitating the possibility of their domination as if they were an extension of the Bedouin locusts, meaning that they want to have the privilege of plundering, domination and stealing as the Bedouin locusts had. They are afflicted with duality on the one hand, and on the other hand they do not have any means of living other than plundering and stealing.
The duality of work and production was missing among the Bedouins and has remained missing among the Arabized until now. Originally, they only want sanctification for themselves, and they use sanctification in the process of subduing and hybridizing consciousness according to their elastic standards regarding the sacred, which has turned into a major problem, especially after it extended to the personal level. Thus, Sinwar reached the rank of Omar, and Omar reached the rank of a sacred god. Even the invasion was considered sacred, and fabrication against the Creator by His creation became sacred. Killing is sacred, and much more. The sacred was surrounded by a wall of excommunication, and whoever excommunicates is killed. Just like that, and with all simplicity! There are more similar events, which there is no room to mention, but there will be sequels in the future!