Ibn al-Walid and    the cannebalism

by dr.m.bitar

google translation

   it is unfair when we attribute to an animal the description of a beast,  for a simple reaso,  The animal refuses todo what humans do in many cases. Even the predation practiced by some animals differs from the predation practiced by some humans, Prairie hyenas abide by some of the laws of the jungle, unlike some humans. Those who turned life into an uncontrolled jungle , The beast kills to eat, but some people kill for pleasureو On the authority of Rion Aron, “Wolves may kill among themselves, but they do not instinctively kill to death. The oppressed animal that surrenders its neck to the fangs of its opponent is not attacked by this opponent. I say that, recalling the story of Ibn al-Walid, who slaughtered 400,000 people during some months, then in another incident 70,000 people, and in another incident the river waters were colored red,  ( blood), due to the large number of slaughters, and what was mentioned was the tip of the iceberg, then a sheikh comes to us who brags and is proud of those actions, not just Sheikh Wajdi Ghoneim,and thousands of sheikhs and a large section of believers who are still begging God to be pleased with their master Khaled Ibn al-Walid and please him Ibn al-Walid also has a guaranteed place in Paradise. He is one of the ten promised Paradise, as confirmed by the Knower of the Unseen Ibn Abdullah.

In the country there is Mosques, streets, and many public facilities have the honor of bearing the name of Ibn al-Walid. Among these people is an Arab muslembrother  who is proud of Ibn al-Walid’s actions, as Ibn al-Walid thereby practiced liberating people from the Romans and placing people on the true religion. Therefore, they became free, neither feared nor sad. The wild beast preys and kills in order to eat, while some humans prey for pleasure. The drawn sword of God Ibn al-Walid had precedents in the case of pleasure in killing, as he lusted after Laila Umm Tamim, the wife of Malik bin Nuwairah, so Ibn al-Walid ordered his swordsman Khattar to amputate bin Nuwairah’s head…  Khattar, amputate his head, Khattar amputated his head, then amputated the heads of the rest of the captives, and thus Ibn al-Walid was able to lie down next to Umm Tamim to have sex with her and rape her on the same night, after a hearty dinner consisting of a stew made from the head of Ibn Nuwayra, meaning that Ibn al-Walid was a creature that belonged to the cannebals… cannebali par excellence. Where did this terrible criminal come from? practicing slaughter and eating the flesh of the dead? This came from the religion or from one of the prominent figures of the religion or from one of the four imams of the religion, which is Al-Shafi’i, who, as the believers claim, filled the surface of the earth with knowledge of the ways to kill a person and eat his flesh, then the permissibility of a male marrying his daughter, and that a woman’s pregnancy may continue for four years after the death of his father, as It is stated in the narrations that Ibn Abdullah remained Ibn Abdullah even though Abdullah died 4 years before the child was born, so the duration of pregnancy is not about 9 months, but may extend to many years according to Al-Shafi’i.

I return to the massacre of hundreds of thousands of the people of the Levant. Is it possible to doubt that Ibn al-Walid and the Bedouin soldiers with him exterminated the people of the Levant en masse? I say collectively because it is difficult to imagine the population of the region, especially Iraq, 1400 years ago, with more than half a million people. Therefore, It is possible to talk about genocide when the number mentioned by Sheikh Wajdi Ghoneim is approximately half a million. This is genocide, like the Ottoman Sultanate’s genocide of the Armenians and other peoples such as the Punts and Assyrians! According to the Arab-Ikhwani narrative that glorified Ibn al-Walid and the actions of the Ottomans regarding their genocide of Armenians and non-Armenians, the Bedouins of the Peninsula carried out a liberation operation in the Levant, to guide people to the Seal of Religions and the Seal of the Prophets. Whoever does the actions of Ibn al-Walid is qualified to do worse than them, that is, genocides, even the butcher. The other, Omar, denounced what Ibn al-Walid did, proving that Ibn al-Walid was the undisputed king of butchers. Omar was also a butcher, but he seemed to be less animalistic and brutal than Saif Allah Ibn al-Walid, whom Brotherhood Arabism sought to immortalize by naming mosques and streets after him… what a shame !!