The past few months have been full of developments and events, which in some aspects are like the conditions that led to the outbreak of World War II, which claimed the lives of 40 million people. Despite the similarity in some points, there is a difference in other points, and this difference is what protected the region from wider and harsher regional wars!
The problem, at its core, stemmed from a conflict between the Nawasib and the Rawafid, after the region’s atmosphere shifted from a quasi-political one following World War I until 1958 to a distinctly sectarian religious one, particularly after 1928, following the birth of Hassan al-Banna’s Muslim Brotherhood, The problem did not originate with Qaradawi, who years ago expressed regret over the attempt to rapprochement with Iran and its integration into the Arab region, Rather, it has roots far deeper than Qaradawi’s imagination suggests, These roots extend back to Ali and Umar and the religious sects that followed each of them, that is, to 1440 years ago, immediately after the birth of Islam, which was political in many respects. Islam was both religion and state; indeed, it could be argued that it was largely a state, or at least an entity where religion and politics were intertwined, deriving its legitimacy from Sharia, Within this framework, the dispute over the caliphate persisted, resulting in the assassination of most, if not all, of the Rightly Guided Caliphs, including the poisoning and subsequent assassination of Ibn Abdullah, The level of killing and violence remained unchanged in the following years and centuries. This characteristic was inherited by the Ottomans, and they even issued a decree or law about it called the “Rebellion” law during the time of Muhammad II. The religious authority approved the law, whose mission was to protect the Sultan from his sons and allowed him to eliminate them. There was no Sultan who did not practice killing his relatives, primarily his sons and brothers.
Religious groups transformed religious doctrine into a political party, meaning that religion was politicized. This intensified in 1928 with the birth of the Muslim Brotherhood. This approach, the approach of the Muslim Brotherhood, continued until the establishment and birth of Hezbollah from the Iranian womb. Hezbollah was tasked with carrying out the dirty work that the Iranian Revolutionary Guard was supposed to do, but preferred to have done by its proxies. Hence, the term “arms” was found and used in the military-political field in particular. Driven by a passion for conquests, the arms multiplied, reaching an almost octopus-like shape, meaning at least four arms. Iran’s concern was not great with the standard of living of Iranians, but rather with the number of Arab capitals that Iran was able to control. It spent hundreds of billions of oil dollars on arms, weapons, and the obsession with the bomb, while 30% of Iranians suffered from extreme poverty in the era of relative calm. Now, in the crisis, the percentage has reached 90%.
We want to make a very brief comparison between the wars and the entities that carried them out, such as Nazism and others, The ideological background in the Hitler case was nationalist, chauvinistic, and racist. As for the Iranian ideological background, it was chauvinistic and racist, but it was dominated by the sectarian motive, which played the role of German chauvinistic racism, which annexed Austria to it, just as Iran annexed Maliki’s Iraq and the three Gulf islands to it. Nazi Germany attacked Poland with the aim of protecting German minorities, just as Hezbollah and Nasrallah wanted to protect Zainab from captivity twice, i.e., exploiting victimhood in both cases!!!! The forces of “Nasrallah” and the Iranian Basij were equivalent to the Nazi SS divisions that were reserved for Aryans only, as is the case with the arm called Hezbollah, which was exclusively for Shiites, and membership in it required military preparation as was the case for members of the Nazi SS.
Hezbollah intervened in the rest of the countries and occupied Syria and Iraq in the first place, and the other Arab countries remained silent, This was met with the silence of France and England behind the “Maginot” line until the occupation of Paris by the Nazis within days after the occupation of Belgium and the Netherlands, In many Arab countries there are Shiite minorities, with the exception of Bahrain, where the popular majority is Shiite. We do not know the reason for the reluctance of the other Arab countries to act after Hezbollah occupied Syria, divided Iraq, dominated part of Yemen, and ruled in Lebanon. Likewise, no valid reason was known for the reluctance of France and Britain to intervene and wait behind the Maginot line.
The Europeans and the rest of the West waiting until the occupation of Paris and the Pearl Harbor incident is incomprehensible, However, they intervened late, and perhaps their delay was related to the number of victims of this war, which exceeded 40 million, If the rest of the Arab countries had intervened regarding Hezbollah and its strange and bizarre war under the name of support and distraction, Lebanon would not have been destroyed in the way it was, and Gaza would not have been completely destroyed, The use of the term “distraction” was a ridiculous invention by Nasrallah. Perhaps Nasrallah did not realize that war is not for amusement and passing the time with distractions, And how did Nasrallah ensure that the other side in the war of distraction would adhere to it? It was proven that it did not adhere at all, and the idea of distraction is insane, As far as we know, Nasrallah has never been a military general!
The global atmosphere before World War II was, in some respects, similar to the Arab atmosphere, The Allies’ assessments regarding the Nazi advance towards Russia were wrong, Stalin believed that the cold would prevent the Germans from carrying out military operations in Siberia. Similarly, Nasrallah and Hezbollah thought that Israel could not withstand a long war, The one who could not withstand a long war was Hezbollah, which relies on arms supplies through Syria, Hezbollah never considered that Israel could cut off its supplies by striking the crossings and, more recently, by changing the Syrian regime. Hezbollah never imagined that the Assad regime is crumbling and sitting on the brink of collapse, waiting to be buried, like Hitler who thought that his country could win a war against the world, Now, those who remain of Hezbollah are promoting the idea that they do not need arms supplies because they produce weapons themselves. This talk is directed at fools, and the foolishness of Hezbollah is that it considers us all fools.