It is not as some thought for Omar’s humanity, it was Omar Caliph who sent Ibn al-Aas to occupy Egypt by the sword, and certainly tens of thousands of people were slaughtered in the context of the invasion of the conquest, and is the ignorance of Ibn al-Khattab the meaning of the conquest of Egypt war???, Ibn al-Khattab was aware of the actions of the leaders of his armies, and was on the full basis of what Amr did, so Amr asked how you enslaved people! , Slavery was a reality realized by Ibn al-Khattab , But it is difficult to imagine a tigger with this ugliness , sends his armies to the occupation , and knows the consequences of this occupation , and then deplores these consequences … Omar has succeeded brilliantly in an unusual practice in human history , sends the Bedouin to steal, loot and loot, and then denounces looting and looting, wow !!!

There are several narratives, about events and cases, proving the practice of Ibn al-Khattab of the legendary quack, the occupation invasion was not a clean war picnic, but it was a heinous colonial war and anti-baracular, bloodshed for it and the peoples were seized and their will was confiscated in living, decision and will!.

There is no difference between the overthrow of the Persian state and the overthrow of Egypt, after the overthrow of the Persian state, tribute was imposed on the Persians and the abscess on the land of the Persians, and the Persians did not attack the Bedouin island, the Bedouins of the island are the ones who attacked the Persians and their women and daughters and their captivity and stole their money and property and colonized, knowing that they were born free like the Egyptians and others, Ibn al-Khattab did not ask the rest of the leaders of his armies, how you enslaved people and their mothers were born free, all the peoples of the open countries were also born free, did not ask because he is a usurper of the impostor, all the peoples had the honor of defending their lands as much as possible, and the difference and his armies had the humiliation and shame of the occupation of the countries of others, and their homes and then their daughters and women.

Egypt was occupied by the Byzantines, so the Egyptians helped the   Bedouin to expel the byazantines  ,   in the hope that the country would be liberated from colonialism, the historian Al-Maqrizi elaborated on the description of the aid provided by the people of Egypt to the new colonizer, The reward of Omar and Amr for them was to impose a cruel tribute exhausted on them, so that the dead had to pay the tribute by their relatives while they were small.

The contribution of the Copts in the financial management led to the attachment of Amr to them a little, which prompted Omar to isolate Amro and the appointment of Abdullah bin Abu al-Sarj in his place, and in the context of the reproach of Amr because of his failure to collect money and export the slabs to Omar Omar said “that the vaccine (the camel) has been more than its first durability”, that is, the proceeds of the dairy cow increased after the appointment of Ibn Abu al-Sarj, here replied Amro Omar .. Because you have harmed the faction, that is, you have harmed her son, that is, the rights of her children.

What Amro and Omar did to the Egyptians of disgrace and killing and gathering for the captivity exceeded all perception, the people of Egypt were for them cattle and cows of milk (her land went and her women played and her men from the victory and her people collected by the drum and dispersed by the stick), so was the look of Omar and Amro for the Egyptians … Then Omar Ibn al-Khattab asks when you enslaved people and their mothers were born free, his wish was able to realize the fabrication in this saying.

The conquests require wherever they ask the question posed by Omar, but Omar asked the question as if the conquest had nothing to do with money, sediments and the spoils of war, as if he sent his military to free people and not to enslave them, he is a just human good actor, and his “age” covenant attests to that … Age covenant was liberated and achieved equality between the conqueror and the open .. What a criminal of an impostor, son of speech!

The fact of Egypt is not unique, and from the like there are thousands, the purpose of mentioning this incident was to prove what must be apologized for from the humiliating and degenerate historical facts, and what must be avoided now and in the future, is not limited to the harm of the adoption of barbarism method to deal with others, the practice of barbarism on harmless primarily self-inflicted, barbarism turned into a synematic nature of the character of the barbarian, after the solutions of the joy of the war empire and after the castration of the Bedouin militarily, the Arabists turned into inside and turned into internal colonialism stealing, looting and looting and alive, not by the provisions and customs of five for him and four-fifths for the thief-loater, the rule was reflected, the Caliph is present four-fifths and the five-fold, so the matter has evolved, and what is more, the matter, and more, and more, the matter, and more, and more, the matter, and more, and more, the most envirusion, the most precious to him and four-fifths of the loot-the-thieved here, the rule was reflected.