Othman Li, Mira Al-Bitar:
Reality demonstrates the existence of what is called political sectarianism, such as the Muslim Brotherhood. This Brotherhood has played a role, the effects of which lie in its negative effects, which we have continually encountered throughout the past century. Regarding the Brotherhood, there are questions that must be raised and answered, including the question of the Brotherhood’s readiness, or the Brotherhood’s culture, to adhere to secularism, which has expanded relations between societies and states and reduced the world functionally to something resembling a village. Here, we do not see a clear answer to this question that is consistent with their practices. On the one hand, they say they want openness, while on the other, they demonize and fight each other first, then declare war through terrorism on what remains of the world and humanity. Analytically, the purposes of declaring war differ from those of declaring modern war in this region. In the past, war was primarily about looting, plundering, and occupying other people’s lands under the pretext of jihad in the cause of God, followed by spreading the faith by the sword. Now, however, especially after the sword has lost its luster and sharpness with rust, the purposes have shifted to an attempt to evade the gains of modernity, such as democracy, equality, science, etc. Previously, others were excommunicated, and now modernity is being excommunicated. This is despite the fact that modernity is an international product, and its prevalence in the West does not mean it is exclusively a Western product. It is a human product that has penetrated all of humanity. Had it not attempted to infiltrate the Muslim Brotherhood, these groups would not have stood in its way, attempting to evade it or the so-called requirements of modernity. Confronting modernity has been a failure in several ways, both ancient and modern. In the past, conquests failed to secure sustainable financing for the invading Bedouins, which eliminated any means of sustainable financing. They focused on collecting tribute, and neglected the element of production. They collected it from a servile hand, one that neither worked in production nor learned the methods of production. Are theft, plunder, and oppression considered work or professions? Let alone a respectable profession!!!! The conquerors’ mission was limited to the sword, which they used to sever the necks of those who refused to pay, humiliated and submissive. Production was possible in agriculture, for example, because the conquered countries, such as the Nile Valley and Mesopotamia, were well-adapted for agriculture. However, the conquerors lacked a culture of work outside the framework of conquest, plunder, and looting. They lived off theft and tribute money. The proceeds from theft were officially divided among the fighters at a ratio of four-fifths, and one-fifth for the leadership, i.e., Ibn Abdullah and the caliphs who came after him. None of it was spent on public purposes, such as construction. They did not build a single theater or dig a single irrigation canal, as the Romans did with irrigation canals, roads, theaters, and construction in general. A tourist comes to the richest regions in the world in antiquities and does not find a single monument constructed by the conquerors over the course of 1,450 years of Quraysh-Ottoman Bedouin rule. It is even impossible to compare what France accomplished in a quarter of a century with what the Quraysh and Ottomans accomplished over 14 centuries. Zero remains zero, even if multiplied by ten thousand or even a million! Political sectarianism, that is, the Brotherhood and their ilk who believe in the necessity of obedience and submission to the guardian appointed by God, do not believe in revolutions, because revolutions involve rebellion against the ruler. However, the Brotherhood is not ashamed to seize control of revolutions, nationalize them, and ride them to impose its guardianship over the people. The Brotherhood steals revolutions, as if the revolution were spoils of war. They combine the revolution with the rituals of jihad for the sake of God, which includes excommunication, sectarianism, fatalism, conspiracy, invasion, assassination, killing, captivity, slaughter, and bombing. In other words, everything that is included in the practices of the factions, led by ISIS. The Brotherhood thieves are not ashamed to claim that they fight, slaughter, kill, and burn for the sake of freedom and democracy. In order to lift injustice from the people and in defense of freedom, justice, truth, and religion, the rape and captivity of 6,000 Yazidis was a religious revolutionary necessity.
These people do not believe in religion as a heavenly doctrine, but rather as a path to power. They are a historical fact, and religion is another historical fact. They do not want guardianship over others based on the concept of care and protection, and they do not start from an understandable background, but rather from a monopoly background of will and destiny. This is because they are the best nation, and their religion is the religion of God, and they are the representatives of God’s will. Whoever does not see what they see is considered immoral, an apostate, a traitor, or an infidel who deserves to be killed. God is the Creator of everything, and thus the owner of everything, and thus their ownership of everything has become a divine right. It is said that the spoils of war are pure and lawful for the believers to enjoy. They have these qualities that are better than understanding religion in its true form, because religion in its true form is also a state, and it is the Brotherhood, that is, a state of the Brotherhood, which also trades and monopolizes violence, the judiciary, and the law. They, as a state, are like the Creator, and they have all the privileges of the Creator, who does what He wills, and He is capable of everything. Their discourse is schizophrenic and the concept of “empowerment” justifies everything, even schizophrenia. Schizophrenia does not distinguish between the Caliphate and the state, nor does it distinguish between citizens and subjects, nor does it differentiate between obedience and the values of freedom. In general, it can be said that, in this respect, they are hysterical and reckless with people’s minds. They confuse Sharia law with legitimacy, and they are not ashamed of blatant lies. Muhammad Salih’s direct broadcasts explain their schizophrenic psychological state. Muhammad Salih’s question about the current place of residence of these refugees is answered by saying that they now live on God’s vast earth, that is, the countries of asylum. Salih asks about the reason for their choice of asylum in Europe, and they answer that they… They are not refugees, but immigrants. Some of them ask how they crossed the border, and they answer, “God willing.” And who issued the entry visa? Also, God’s will. They claim that they pray five times a day, and what if the worshipper neglects the evening prayer, for example? He is killed! Then they ask, “Why didn’t you immigrate to Afghanistan?” They answer, “Because the Taliban are infidels, and so are the Saudis, and the Gulf is infidel.” And is Europe a believer? She is an infidel, but they do not live in Europe, but rather in their believing neighborhoods (cantons) in Berlin, Potsdam, Brussels, etc. Muhammad Salih asks about marrying girls under the age of nine years, and they answer that what concerns Ibn Abdullah is true and there is no doubt about it, so it is permissible to marry a daughter at the age of nine years. Horrific answers from a horrific reality!!!!!