Humanizing society and eliminating gods

   Democracy began in the city of Athens, when the god became a human, that is, democracy began in Athens when the relationship of vertical inequality disappeared, that is, when the god disappeared through their humanization and transformation into humans, and thus horizontal equality between humans was activated and democracy began, no democracy between God and humans, because God does not equate himself with humans.

There are common expressions in the field of philosophy such as the philosophy of crisis and there is the crisis of philosophy, and it is possible to copy this and apply it to many other cases such as the crisis of civilization, there is the civilization of crisis, and democracy, which was one of the most important components of civilization, its construction faltered greatly among the Bedouin groups, so was the reason for the faltering of the democratic construction the accumulation of crises (chronic crisis)? Or was the reason for the accumulation of crises (chronic crisis) the reason for the faltering of democracy, which was caused by humans sharing the responsibility of organizing their lives with gods and their likes!

We tend to believe in a certain kind of causality, a kind that makes crises a result of the faltering and inability of democracy in a society that shares with the gods the responsibility for organizing and developing its life. Crisis is an expression of the accumulation of crises, and accumulation usually occurs when there is no ability to address a crisis or problem, as the crisis remains unresolved and accumulation occurs. Resolving crises requires societal forces, the most important of which is the power of democracy. However, when there is no society in the contractual, solidarity, and mutual support sense, and when there are multiple, scattered, wandering groups with no contractual, solidarity, and mutual support link between them except neighborliness, physical proximity, and loyalty to divine colonialism, it is impossible to build a democracy, and thus these groups lack the power that enables them to resolve crises. Divine colonialism is not necessarily heavenly colonialism, but in most cases earthly (deification), which was the rock on which the democratic idea crumbles and on which every democratic project is destroyed.

There is no societal development without encountering stumbling blocks, metaphorically called crises. There are not only internal stumbling blocks, but also external ones, and all stumbling blocks are internal-external, especially in our time, a time of entanglement and overlap. The regional plot was part of the global plot, so it is impossible to distinguish between failure to resolve the Palestinian issue, for example, and failure to find a solution to any other stumbling block or problem, whether economic, political, or otherwise. Solving every crisis, big or small, requires the employment of societal forces, the most important of which is the power of democracy. What made me cry was the claim of the Arab regimes that they voluntarily abandoned democracy, or postponed it indefinitely, intending to liberate Palestine first, and after the liberation the regimes would devote themselves to building democracy, going to war unarmed in order to win! And after the victory they acquire weapons. How can the pillars of this thinking align with each other??

In general, it can be said that the crisis is not a cause for the absence of democracy, but rather a result of the absence of democracy, and the absence of democracy is one of the most important causes of the crisis, knowing that some features of the relationship between cause and effect are mixed with the features of the defective circuit. The crisis that reaches a very high degree until it becomes an obstacle to democratic construction, knowing that the crisis is originally a result of the loss of democratic construction. Despite all of this, we cannot assert the impossibility of democracy in the Arab East in the future, despite the fact that the project of building democracy is very difficult in this region full of religion and deceptive, hypocritical formal religiosity. There are limits to the effectiveness of every social value, but there are no limits to the destructive capacity of hypocrisy.

The fall of Assad was nothing more than the fall of a person, and we did not think that the alternative would necessarily be absolute chaos, a Salafist regime, another person, surrender to Israel, or in short, what we see now of chaos and civil wars in the coast, south, and east of Syria. The fall of Assad was accompanied by other possibilities, including the seizure of power by a party better than Assadism, or by a party worse than Assadism. Who can claim, or rather assert, that the people who have regressed to the state of tribalism, bribed by religion, will be able to produce a “wishful” regime with its limited, paralyzed, and disabled capabilities, like camels that have been killed and buried for half a century, and characterized by the absence of a sincere popular movement? Truth is negated in several ways, including, for example, the new phenomenon of “tukwi’a,” which means the invention of a new linguistic-behavioral term, such as the term “ta’fish” as an alternative to the term “spoils of war.” The number of fabricators who are being copied  has increased to the point that it no longer allows for the distinction between deception and truth. We do not want to mention… The names of hundreds of people who represent opportunism in its ugliest forms, but we want to confirm the death of morals, and in this regard we mention Ahmed Shawqi’s poem: “Nations are nothing but morals