The sacred barbarity of language and history

     The sacred burden of the Arabic language lies in its being the language of the call to prayer and the language of the Quran, and then the claim that it is the language of Adam, Here the following question must be asked: How has the sanctification of Arabic affected this language?

Undoubtedly, sanctification raised its moral standing, but it diminished its value and practical capabilities, Sanctification restricted it, hindered its development, and plunged it into a crisis regarding its potential uses, Language is not exclusively for crafting Al-Mutanabbi’s poetry, which does not require change and development, but rather for expressing other aspects of life characterized by change and development, Here, sanctification stood as an obstacle to the language and a reduction in its potential uses, The accumulation of this characteristic, i.e., the lack of potential uses, led to a gradual and increasing decrease in its functional tasks, until this language became out of service, like a museum piece, In conclusion, it can be said that charging the language with the sacred harmed it, for the sacred is the poison   which and by which the language dies!

The sacred burden of jihad and conquests is characterized by being an obligation and a condition for the completion of religion for thieves and criminals who are confused with religion and hide under its banner and kill in its name,Jihad can be considered the sixth pillar of religion, Jihad is more important than prayer, For camouflage, jihad is linked to the concept of “in the way of God,” while jihad is in reality not in the way of God, but in the way of the Sultan and in the way of spoils!

The crude power does not know asceticism, and the Bedouin of the Hijaz with a religious veneer followed the path of non-asceticism, like other barbarians who invaded, destroyed, burned and annihilated nations and peoples, When power was limited to barbarism, the sword, and the sword, they triumphed over many civilizations in the Mediterranean basin, and established a Bedouin Hijazi empire that possessed nothing of religion except the black flag and decadence.

The faith of these Bedouins in religion could only be a formalistic religiosity, for beliefs do not spread like a plague unless they are a plague,The Bedouins of the peninsula united themselves under the new banner as a band of plunder, war, and spoils, and then they created a system that encouraged jihadists regarding the distribution of shares: one-fifth for Ibn Abdullah and his successors, and four-fifths for the mujahideen, Thus, they legitimized evil, set rules and regulations for it, and cloaked it in the guise of a sacred call, They lied to themselves, to other peoples, and primarily to God, whom they placed on their side in the battles of slavery, concubines, and captives. The jihad of thievery and spoils was for the sake of God, as they lie! Does the Creator of heaven, man, and earth need spoils of war?!   

They sanctified themselves and their deeds, because God was with them and inspired them, as they claim or lie!!!! Their thievery regarding “in the way of God” distorted God and turned Him into a partner in theft and into a foolish, racist, stupid killer, They believed their lies, which destroyed them and turned them into parasitic peoples living off looting, begging, and corruption, and unable to live off their own production, meaning they lost the duality of production – living, and the culture of work and integrity of position and opinion. Lying was the basic characteristic of those peoples, and deception was and remains the twin of lying to this hour.

They were corrupted by the culture of plunder, parasitism, and theft, and over time they turned into riffraff addicted to empty boasting and forgery without any moral restraint, Where do morals come from when their history is, on the whole, a history of plunder, theft, and seizure of other people’s property, and living off this property, which they called spoils of war, permissible and pure.

They sanctify their history, which their historians derived from “virtual” reality at times, from imagination at other times, and from the politics of justifying bestiality and savagery at times, from the myth and imaginary glories that were associated with the period in which the Arabs of the Peninsula began to invade and occupy the lands of the peoples of the regions neighboring them in the framework of what they called conquests, to justify the act and sanctify it in comparison to settler and non-settler occupations, The matter of others’ awareness of the content of the criminal conquest prohibited by the League of Nations was absent from their awareness, a content that was one of the ugliest and most despicable forms of settler colonialism, In any case, they had no interest in others, except in terms of plundering others, Their only interest was centered around the sword, myth, lies, selfishness, violence, and the vulva as the source of relief!  

They established a vast political and military empire, yet they never once asked themselves, how do we justify the Bedouin conquests of the Hejaz while condemning the imperialist colonial movements of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries? Bedouin narcissism prevents them from asking such questions, and minds clouded by hypocrisy cannot answer them, Self-centeredness prevents them from viewing the issue of the invasion and occupation of Spain from the perspective of the Spaniards and their situation after Musa ibn Nusayr gathered tens of thousands of virgins and shipped them to his master, the Caliph, for marriage, rape, and enslavement, The Caliph wanted them sealed and unused—virgins! As for the status of these virgins, there are those among the animals of this era who envy them the honor of being raped by the Caliph and traded by him, Due to the large number of captives, their price in the slave markets plummeted, and the price of a captive became lower than the price of a donkey!

    The bestiality of the Caliphate and its workers is difficult to imagine even in its historical context, As for the bestiality and savagery of the creatures of this era, the subhumans, it is also difficult to imagine, What kind of creature is this that sees no fault in shipping virgins to the Caliph and is ready to repeat the act even in this era? In ISIS, you have a good successor to a good predecessor!

When the paralyzed arms and minds, suffocated by the religious constraint that hinders all expansion, openness, movement and development in creating a prosperous present and thus a flourishing future, failed, they resorted to imagination, lying and claiming the existence of what does not exist, They inflated the mouse and turned it into an elephant, You ask them, “How are you today?” They say we were a nation of fire and light, that we conquered a quarter of the world and carried the banner of civilization and progress, We developed our scholars from physics to jurisprudence, from chemistry to the machinations of Ibn Taymiyyah, We eliminated scholars of knowledge one by one; some we roasted alive, some we crucified, some we slaughtered, and some we poisoned, And now, thank God, we have an abundance of scholars who draw from God’s knowledge, God’s physics, and God’s law. And with God’s knowledge, we split the atom and unraveled the mysteries of the galaxy (Zaghloul El-Naggar), We turned the airplane into a tambourine, the car into a donkey, and bought the free woman in the temporary marriage market, Our leaders became jungle men riding tanks. We left nothing untouched by our distortion, even attributing poetry to a bygone era (Taha Hussein), Our criminals weren’t enough, so we created imaginary heroes who never set foot on earth, like Al-Qa’qa’ and others, with the aim of inciting the Bedouin to raid as role models. Al-Qa’qa’, the Caliph Abu Bakr said: “No army that includes Al-Qa’qa’ ibn Umar has ever been defeated!”

Sheikh Al-Huwayni and other animals confirm many of the statements of critics of religious history, for example, the number of massacres of Ibn Al-Walid, the number of massacres of Uqba Ibn Nafi, Amr Ibn Al-Aas, and others, The higher the number, the more Sheikh Al-Huwayni swelled with pride, and the faster the hearts of some believers beat with pride in the shameful evil, Criticism was based on the history written by the monsters of this history, and not on the accounts of the captives and their families, as stated in Husam Itani’s book, A political history written in red with blood and in black with deeds, a history in which some prosperity was manifested when the sword was broken, and much decline when the sword triumphed (Philip Hitti), What the venerable Sheikh Al-Huwayni, who wanted to invade Europe twice a year to bring back blondes, preached and continues to preach is consistent with the age of the sword and the age of decadence, which has been transferred in its entirety to the present, What the Sheikh was proud of was, even in its historical context, barbarism, and in the present, barbarism that even imagination and conception are unable to describe.