From bad to worse

 Ma  Bitar ,Samir Sadek:

 

السفاهة في الوسط الأكاديمي: باع ضميرا فأصبح وزيرا ! - علي أسعد وطفة - د. علي أسعد وطفةIs it reasonable for Arab democratic development to wait for it not to falter? Are there any data that confirms even the success of the modest minimum? And did the Arabs work seriously on the democratic path, and who are those who are serious about achieving any democratic development? Then is there an “independent” popular will and who is a value on this will?, Is there already an Arab “people” meaning “people and a state” for this phrase? Is democracy suitable for groups controlled by Bedouin, tribal, family and sectarian status? There are hundreds of questions on this subject!, Compared to other peoples, it can be said that the Arabs are the most hypocritical people of the universe, from the most modern people from democracy, and one of the least practiced peoples of the universe, from the most corrupt, hypocritical, arrogant, narcissistic, closed-up and past people, in short, the worst nations of humanity !!!

Because of the many rhetoric and lack of practice reasons, the Arabizer, like others, aspires to what is better, so he talks about the best, and talk about the best is not subject to objective restrictions, while the practice of democracy is supposed to be achieved in practice, and the investigation is subject to obstacles and objective effects that may be historical, instantaneous, external or internal .. Etc., and requests efforts to remove those disabilities such as the entanglement of things and the contradiction or mutuality of historical data, then the overlap of interests and their variation and then the dominant culture, etc., all this confirms that the “stumbling” in the democratic development is the only constant in this region, which is the element that every rational or historically intellectual expects, that it is the element on which dictatorships and sectarianism relied to justify their existence and the continuation of this existence.

The dictatorships on the element of disability called different names, Mubarak called it “chaos” and said either me or chaos, and Bashar called it the end of the existence of Syria by division and fragmentation, and then the end of the resistance and thus the extension of the Euphrates to the Nile, i.e. the final destruction, and the Golani no longer a final rejection of democracy, so that he refuses to utter the word “democracy”, the difference between Mubarak’s estimates and the example of Assad and the next God, Mubarak is warned of the consequences of the chaos of the Golan, and the resistance of the least of the Assad’s independence, the least of the “life of the Assad’s renewal, and the continuation of the “revolution of the Assad’s like the enemy, the eternal, the greatest of the Assad, the greatest of the resistance, the like of the Assad, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the Assad, the likeness of the resistance, the eternal, the like of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the greatest of the resistance of the Assad, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the resistance, the greatest of the resistance, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the greatest of the resistance, the likeness of the enemy, the like of the resistance, the likeness of the resistance, the likeness of the enemy, the greatest of the resistance, the like of the enemy, the like of the enemy, the like of the resistance, the like of the enemy, the like of the enemy, the likeness of the Assad, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the Assad, the likeness of the enemy, the greatest of the enemy, the likeness of the Assad, the likeness of the resistance, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the lion, the likeness of the enemy, the like of the enemy, the like of the enemy, the like of the enemy, the like of the enemy, the like of the Assad, the like of the Assad, the like of the Assad, the like of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the lion, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the lion, the likeness of the enemy, the like of the enemy, the like of the Assad, the like of the enemy, the likeness of the resistance, the likeness of the Assad, and the greatest of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the lion, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the like of the enemy, the eternal, the non-religied, the non-existn-upmoleeded, the eternal, the nomine, the eternal, the no more, the enemy, nor the equivalent of the enemy, or the eternal, the enemy, the enemy, the likeness of the enemy, the likeness of the lion, the likeness of the enemy, the eternal, and the eternal, the non-conservitude, the non-condition of the enemy, the eternal, the non-in-feverification of the country, the non-liest-reverther, the continuation of the state, the least of the concept, and the continuation of the state, the continuation of the “reconcentes” and the future of the renewal of the homeland, the least of the Egyptian, and the continuation of the renewal of the Syrian, the least of the concept, that the country will be implemented, and the least of the enemy, the eternal, and the eternal, the non-imiliviblioism, the continuation of the “rehabiliving” the most likely, the mid-line, the continuation of the Egyptian, the continuation of the renewal of the Syrian, the least of the renewal of the Syrian, that the renewal of the enemy, and the continuation of the “recondition” of the country, the eternal “the enemy, the like the exception of the Assad, and the absence of the least, the continuation of the resistance of the Syrian, that the renewal of the enemy, and the continuation of the equation of the “residing, the interpretation of the Assad, the like, the eternal, and the eternal, the renewal of the country, the likeness of the resistance, the eternal, and the continuation of the Assad, and the eternal, the renewal of the Assad, and the eternal, the continuation of the “non-nationalness, the interpretation of the “non-national, the application of the Assad, the like, the eternal,

The rule of Assad half a century, and was able to suppress the Sunni Brotherhood and strengthen the Shiite brotherhood, and brought the mercenaries of Hezbollah, i.e. an element of the so-called axis of resistance and resistance, or the Shiite axis composed of Assad in addition to Nasrallah and the mullahs, flew the banner of Hussein on the mosques in Qusayr, and was protected the shrine of Sayyida Zainab, while Nasrallah did not care about the shrine of Mar Maroun, and if Samir Geagea invaded Syria for the shrine of Maroun, we would have said that Geagea sectarian Maron, because the application of the mechanism to protect the shrines on all sects, boredom and nationalities will turn Syria into a structure similar to the structure of the Rokfort, any stagnant rotten, and thus the end of the project of the state of citizenship in the countries of this region.

The disgust of the lion from the Sunni brotherhood is similar to the disgust of the prostitute from the whore, and it can be said without hesitation that Nasrallah and the Shiite party and his political activity is the eye, mind and heart of political Islam in its Shiite form, which is not different from the Sunni formula by anything, the Shiite mullahs such as the Sunni brotherhood or the brothers of the Umayyads, all of them are corrupt sectarians are religiously racist, and all of them are subject to a base from bad to worse, Hafez al-Assad was better than Bashar, and Bashar was better than Abu Muhammad al-Julani, Bashar participated Sunnis perhaps forced into rule and talked about democracy and secularism and considered Syria the only secular fortress in this region, with Golanism and secularism and the participation of the rest of the Syrians in the government, even the standard of living of Syrians and Syrians deteriorated terrribly under the rule of Al-Julani, even in a short period of time.

The bad and the worst “political illiteracy” in the country, abolished politics at the popular level, and eliminated the institution of the judiciary already weak, and replaced politics with sectarianism, and political references sectarian sectarian references and many more, all of them personally reaped what they planted, and the fate of Golani will not differ from the fate of Morsi Label will be worse than the fate of Morsi and worse than the fate of the   Assads !!!

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *