There are international developments that indicate the growing of moving away from the application of the death penalty, which is still concentrated mainly in several countries, including China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, and in some regions such as Afghanistan and now in Syria, and to move away from the application of the death penalty, justified, including the fact that this punishment is revenge and not constructive, and has not yet been proven its usefulness, as the level of crime in the countries that apply it is still higher than its level in countries that do not apply it, there is no reform through the application of this punishment, and then that crime or Terrorism in many cases is not the work of the criminal, i.e. the perpetrator of the crime, who is born innocent, but from the made of circumstances or intellectual background, which turns man into a criminal, such as intellectual backgrounds promoting murder, corruption and revenge, and intellectual backgrounds that command the limit of the killing of the apostate from religion. The intellectual background that commands the killing of the apostate is the criminal background, which deserves punishment in the first place.

This punishment is mainly applied in authoritarian countries and in class societies, and then it is a non-deletible punishment in case of proving that the judicial ruling on it was not fair. There are different forms of execution, including the form of arbitrary execution, such as a person being killed by unbandoned groups, and as is common in military regimes, such as so-called field executions, what interests us on this occasion in the first place is the execution of the apostate, and the apostate was the young Libyan young man Ziaedddin Balao.

We will not go on to mention the fatwas and verses that order the killing of the apostate, if the killing is after three or thirty days or otherwise, and then it is not necessary to mention the verses and hadiths on this subject, all information about the apostate and the need to kill him is available on the network, and the source of the death sentence against the young man Zia al-Din Balao was religious texts, clear hadiths and jurisprudence!

The forms of legal jurisprudence differ regarding the necessity of killing the apostate, including completely lunse forms such as considering apostasy as a threat to faith, and killing the apostate represents protection for faith, including the schischism of the positions of Al-Qaradawi, who talked about the guardian who must apply the limit of apostasy, that is, killing the apostate, in completely ignoring the state institution that does not know a guardian of the matter, Al-Qaradai was by virtue of his position as a guardian of the believers, so what would the fate of Al-Qaradawi if he applied the limit of apostasy to an apostate and kill him in any of the countries Arabic or any of the countries of the world? And even in Iran or Pakistan, only we know that those who established the limit of apostasy against a university student in Pakistan were punished, so the fate of Al-Qaradawi would be similar if he killed an apostate in Qatar, Al-Qaradawi and the like were not allowed to realize that humanity was organized in the form of states, and countries have laws for hundreds of years.

Whatever the definition of apostasy and whatever the jurisprudence of this definition and whatever its source, the killing of the apostate is a criminal act like any other murder, the death sentence of the Libyan young man is nothing but criminality, and there is no take on the behavior of the high-class independent Libyan young man, that he is a person who respects himself and does not allow others to impose belonging on him, he does not want