The concept of circular migration is old and has been successfully implemented by India, for example, Circular migration is related to defining the relationship between the homeland and refugees in other countries, and theoretically, all of this can be applied to expatriates. Here, “circular migration” regulates the situation of the refugee or expatriate by not considering the return of the refugee or expatriate to the country or entity whose circumstances forced the expatriate or refugee to leave the country as a final return, That is, the refugee or expatriate can move from the entity he came from to the country he immigrated to or vice versa freely and whenever he wants, in order for both countries to benefit from the experiences of these people moving from one country to another according to demand, necessity, and possibility, The most successful country in practicing circular migration was India, which was able to benefit well from mobile skills,The Indian was able to work sometimes in England, America, Germany, or other countries, and sometimes in India according to the requirements of his interest.

We don’t know exactly how al-Julani came to know this idea, Someone who has spent his entire conscious life—that is, after childhood, after the age of 18—hunting people down, killing, slaughtering, burning, or bombing them, is incapable of dealing with topics like circular migration, In fact, a slaughterer, like al-Qaeda, ISIS, or al-Julani, doesn’t think, and is therefore functionally illiterate, Al-Julani has proven his illiteracy because he hasn’t grasped most of the issues he faces, including the issue of circular migration, which he hasn’t been able to comprehend or understand, He understands nothing about this topic, nothing about Syria, and nothing about India and its successful experience with circular migration, India doesn’t export refugees to various parts of the world like Syria, which has exported more than half its population to other countries like Turkey, Europe, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, and others. There are Indian expatriates in other countries, and these people can return to India without fear for their lives and then move from India to another country whenever they want, The situation in this regard is very different in Syria. Those who emigrated or sought refuge were essentially “fleeing” Syria. As for its conditions, whoever enters Syria cannot leave whenever he wants. The Syrian regime is a religious dictatorship like the Iranian mullah regime, which does not respect the freedom and will of the individual, The Indian regime, on the other hand, is democratic and respects the will, freedom, and rights of the individual, The current Syrian regime is neither democratic nor does it respect the freedom or will of the individual, To some extent, the saying “the one who enters is lost and the one who leaves is born” applies to the Syrian regime, especially the latter one, Does a day pass in Syria without assassinations, kidnappings, and human rights violations?

There is no doubt that the idea of ​​circular migration is good, and to the extent that it has a fundamental relationship with many factors such as the relationship of the refugee or expatriate with the country he came from, which is Syria in this case, and the matter applies to the rest of the regimes in the region, There is no doubt that benefiting from the experiences of expatriates or refugees is theoretically possible, provided that they exist, What is the experience of Syrian refugees, 50% of whom are illiterate? Is this benefit possible in the case of the Syrian refugee? The idea of ​​someone moving around according to the concept of circular migration, from a country where the electricity bill is practically insignificant in Europe, for example, while their income in Syria isn’t even enough to cover a portion of that bill—with 90% of Syrians living below the poverty line and the average Syrian income among the lowest in the world—would encourage any Syrian to move for work between any European country and Syria? And who told Mr. Al-Julani that European countries accept a circular migration system for Syrian refugees, when a country like the United States refuses to grant entry visas to any Syrian, regardless of the reason? And in Europe, the situation has transformed into the American model: circular migration without entry visas! Would European countries accept the idea of ​​de-escalation so that the intermittent, phased return of Syrian refugees becomes permanent and continuous after a period of time? Was the issue of work and experience the primary reason for Europeans’ resentment towards Syrian refugees? Or was it due to the criminal behavior of Syrians, their corruption, their superficial religiosity, and their belief that they are the best of nations, etc.? And can corruption, crime, and religious bigotry be integrated into the concept of migration? Circular?

  All of that is impossible and cannot be implemented, It is not possible to talk here about turning human loss into gain through circular migration, The situation of Syrians in Europe has no relation to the foundations of circular migration, but rather to the natures and behaviors of Syrian refugees centered around corruption, crime, Islam, jihad, street prayers, then the hijab, niqab, school, inability to integrate with the rest of the Europeans, and many other factors. The Syrian refugee does not generally work, and the percentage of those who work does not exceed 5%. Those who do not work do not enter the circular migration cycle!

  In general, we are not surprised by the futility of Al-Julani’s proposals during his recent visit to Germany, We think he does not know Syrians, does not know Europeans, and does not know anything about what is called circular migration!