Defiling the female with sacred street insults

Samir Sadek, Syriano:

ſłĵŜƀ̝ þą̸̝Ĝÿ ̩üĢƀ̝ ĬŁĜš ̶üƀĜĀō̝        Society establishes its own hierarchy of respect and contempt, the nature of which is determined by the era in which a person lives, Wealth, for example, dictates the level of respect, as does power and many other factors, Honor, for instance, signifies a high and elevated status, The bearer of honor varies. In the feudal era, honor was the exclusive domain of feudal lords, who were called nobles, In a religious era, some monopolized honor by claiming descent from the Prophet Muhammad, such as the Sharif of Mecca, or “Sayyid” Hassan Nasrallah, and then Saddam Hussein, who, according to his own self-proclaimed lineage, traced his ancestry back to the prophets, In a discussion with the Lebanese lawyer, Bushra al-Khalil, this Botox-inflated old woman tried to force her interlocutor to call Nasrallah “Sayyid” due to his lineage tracing back to the Prophet Muhammad. In the feudal era, often intertwined with religious authority, the rest of humanity had no honor or respect, and their social standing was low, unlike the religious figures who, despite their baseness and contemptibility, were the highest, Those in power prevented, and continue to prevent, any criticism of them, considering such criticism… Disdain and contempt for religion, for religion and religious figures have a high place on the ladder of respect and contempt!!! 

The capitalist era in Europe changed those considerations towards equality between women and men before the law and in rights and duties, After the capitalist era, there were other eras that changed some aspects of the subject of consideration, All of this passed by the Arab peoples without much notice, as the Arab peoples are still swimming in the swamp of considerations such as the consideration of shame, and then considerations related to what is permissible and forbidden, Shame was attached to the woman with a focus on the position of her private parts, which determined whether she was considered honorable or not, The honorable woman is the chaste one. Although the concept of chastity applies to every human being, male or female, the male is not usually accused of deviating from the rules of chastity no matter what he does, Chastity linguistically means faith and adherence to the rulings of heaven. And did the male always adhere to those rulings? And what about the subject of chastity before the call to Islam? Did chastity have a place in the pre-Islamic era or in ancient times?

Many concepts are dominated by a thick and dense layer of fog and mud. It seems as if Aristotle’s saying that “wood is fire in potential” applies to the female, because the burning of wood generates fire, The woman, who is reduced according to local concepts to a body, and the body is reduced to a vulva, has been transformed into a shame in potential, like Aristotle’s wood, The female is positioned by her nature and constitution around the vulva, and is considered an appendage of the vulva. She is a body and an entity, a “vulva” that possesses a body, and not a body with a vulva or possessing a vulva, She is thus born and created with threatened chastity, that is, she is created without chastity, She is an immoral being by nature, therefore she must be monitored, controlled, and custodianized.

The communities of this region are drowning in piles of garbage practices, and among the types of garbage or trash is that duality, which reaches the point of feeling that there are no minds in the heads, The “illegitimate” sexual act, which requires the actual or imagined participation of the woman, as in the case of masturbation, is considered a shame attached to the woman, and even includes her clan or family, while the righteous, i.e. the believers, are promised the gardens of heaven despite their basic participation in the act, And the matter in heaven is as it is on earth, as eternal life in the gardens of heaven is mainly limited to the sexual pleasures of men, There is no mention in heaven of the sexual pleasures of women. Rather, the sexual pleasure of women is considered an ugly thing, “may God make it ugly.” It is inherently degrading and a shame by force. From these considerations, the degrading insults in society are produced, imprinted with a female sexual character that violates the woman’s body.

We don’t know the true origin of these perceptions and insults, nor the corresponding texts and verses that are no different from insults, but rather worse than vulgar street insults, of course, while the insults in the texts are considered sacred  , Among the insults in the texts is the view that women are deficient in intellect and religion,The matter is similar regarding testimony or blood money, then beating, guardianship, and fate, then considering women as property for men. Honor crimes are worse than street insults, and nothing is more despicable and hateful than stoning on charges of adultery, knowing that adultery does not exist! Because consensual sexual relations are not adultery, and forced sexual relations are rape, and it is unknown to us that a woman has ever raped a man, The question remains, where did the sacred legal insult come from, and why did this “street” insult target the woman’s body exclusively?

Generally speaking, it can be said that the legalized, or rather, the street-level, insult is built on the assumption that a woman’s body carries a conception of honor residing within her, or more precisely, within her genitals. It can also be said that the source of this conception was customs and traditions in partnership with religion and ancient beliefs. Although the agent in the present and now should be a product of the present and now—meaning that the old should be considered obsolete and outdated—reality proves that it has not lost its validity and remains active because it represents a profitable investment for some,Within the religious community or authority, there is a class that benefits from dividing the community into two groups: the first is the class of enslaved women, and the second is the class of enslaved men, who dominate a society that enslaves and oppresses one another, The enslaved have a very particular taste regarding the path to happiness; the enslaved desire sex by force, i.e., rape, not within the framework of love as a natural being would, The differences between the two classes stem from the degree of humanization, The closer a human being is to animality, the higher their level of happiness rises through coercion and rape. The higher the level of humanization, the closer it is to sexual pleasure within the framework of love, of which sex is the highest form.

To justify the need to insult women, their status must be diminished, for example by considering them deficient in intellect and religion, There is no equality with men in their testimony or in their blood money when they are killed, The blood money for a woman is half that of a man, and the blood money for a non-Muslim woman is half that of a Muslim woman, In terms of calculations, the blood money for a non-Muslim woman is considered a quarter of that of a man, Also, polygamy is permitted, so the value of the wife becomes bankrupt,All of this is done through the mujahideen of religion from the sheikhs, who deceive women with cheap tricks and degenerate lies, While the woman is kicking, she is told, “You, my sister, are the crown of my head, so I must slaughter you in defense of my honor.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *