April 11, 2026

      After the discovery of several severed heads, it was proven that they were the heads of Yazidi women and men, and it was proven that the perpetrator was ISIS, Here, some people rushed to this news and began to ask questions about the documentation,Whoever does not document this incident with evidence is one of the malicious haters of the true religion.

    Is it possible for ISIS to commit such an act? The answer is yes, a thousand times yes, ISIS is capable of slaughtering Yazidis and others, especially given its   religious expiatory , and it has done so 

After the question about documentation, the link to the origin of ISIS came, It was said that it was a creation of intelligence agencies! However, ISIS has been ideologically rooted in people’s minds for 1400 years, and at that time there were no intelligence agencies, and there was no need for it to be called ISIS, What Khalid ibn al-Walid, Uqba ibn Nafi, Saladin, the Rightly Guided Caliphs  and Ibn Abdullah and others did is nothing but a copy of the actions of ISIS, or more accurately, ISIS is a copy of them, The Muhammadan thought represents the intellectual background of about 65 organizations the size of ISIS, not to mention the smaller organizations, Were all those organizations created by intelligence agencies?

 The insistence on absolving religion of ISIS has unconscious underpinnings, The first underpinning, in essence, is accepting ISIS, then reassuring the people who support ISIS that ISIS will remain, because the existence of ISIS is linked to the existence of intelligence, and the existence of intelligence is linked to the existence of America, and whoever wants to eliminate ISIS must eliminate intelligence, Therefore, whoever rejects ISIS must occupy America,So let’s occupy America and other countries whose intelligence contributed to the birth of ISIS!!!

 The second background includes disclaiming responsibility for combating ISIS. Those who absolve religion of responsibility for ISIS do not take any action against ISIS except for cheap talk., Rather, they consider ISIS a “revolution” and applaud its military activities,They consider the parts of the country that fell under ISIS control as liberated areas, such as the liberated Idlib,Then they accuse others of betraying the glorious revolution for failing to support the “revolution,” i.e., ISIS. So far, we have not heard from any Salafist fundamentalist a specific definition of revolution and revolutionaries, Does religion allow a revolution against the ruler when he commands obedience to the ruler appointed by God? Who are these revolutionaries? And what kind of future do we expect if these revolutionaries achieve a military victory?

 The statement “This has nothing to do with Islam” distorts the essence of people’s concerns, Humanity’s goal is not to exonerate or condemn religion, but to prevent terrorism, Simply repeating that statement and thus confirming the innocence of religion distorts the goals that humanity wants to achieve, Exonerating religion is an act against accusing religion, Thus, the statement of accusing religion – exonerating religion – becomes a kind of centrality in this issue, If the important thing is to exonerate religion, then what about ISIS??? Here, the issue of ISIS becomes a secondary matter compared to exonerating religion.

It seems like a matter of hypocrisy and dissimulation, so it is logical that the results of practicing dissimulation would also be dissimulation,One form of self-dissimulation was the complacency that prosperity and peace would come with the departure of the current ISIS, The assumption that the departure would be final as soon as there was a military victory over the current ISIS was wrong, because if the conditions that led to the awakening of ISIS, which has been dormant for centuries and has awakened several times in the past, do not change, ISIS will remain fundamentally, and there is no benefit in changing its name to obscene, monstrous, or reckless, Numbing ISIS and putting it to sleep does not mean its death, as its awakening one day may manifest itself in a form more Daesh-like than the current ISIS,One day ISIS will awaken, and this is nothing less than inevitable, as ISIS is part of the essence of reality, Not changing the conditions, i.e., reality, is something that imposes its continuation in the form that is always latent and in the form that is sometimes awakened.

 To consider ISIS as something foreign to the region, something brought in by so-and-so—for example, the Americans, Iran, a conspiracy, the Assad regime, the Alawites, or the Sunnis, etc.—as a kind of import of a commodity branded “ISIS seeds” and then planted in these lands, represents a foolish disregard for the cultural, social, and political environment of this region, which is very fertile ground for producing ISIS, ISIS members, and their ilk, To say that ISIS was a case of the jihadist disease infiltrating the region from six directions is a naive attempt to absolve oneself and societies from ISIS, its actions, and its artful practice of depravity, To say that ISIS has nothing to do with religion is reminiscent of a hadith of the Prophet who said, “I have come to you with slaughter…” etc. Here, we must say that Ibn Abdullah does not represent true Islam, and what he said has nothing to do with religion!

 ISIS is, in essence, a facet of the cultural, historical, and social fabric of this region, ISIS is not the offspring of a slave, but rather the offspring of a lady, And even the offspring of a lady, in its purest form, is not an exaggeration to say that ISIS is more authentic, consistent, and aligned with the culture of the region as we experience it, The massacres of ISIS represent depravity, and depravity is the common denominator of all the scum that has lived in the swamps of this region for centuries.