Perhaps a large number of people will condemn the idea of ​​women challenging the Bedouin religious Arab spirit, but the idea of ​​challenge will, in turn, find harmony with most of the advanced global thought, and with global thinkers such as Kant and his call for challenge and courage in confronting the exploitation and male and religious enslavement of women. Confronting enslavement represents the noblest of social values ​​aimed at preserving life among the living, as there is no need to preserve the illusory life among the dead, since there is no life in death or after death, and there is no meaning to life in conditions of oppression, enslavement and contempt, which represent the assassination of man.

 Why does masculinity practice the oppression of women, i.e., social oppression? The answer to this question is not necessary in advanced societies, which do not oppress women, but the search for the answer is urgent and necessary in backward societies, In fact, the oppression of women does not exist except in those backward societies, i.e., in “muscular” societies, which provide primitive masculinity with what is called “muscular dominance,” which is usually accompanied by a terrible savagery based on a terrible lack of ability to perceive anxiety, fear, and unhappiness in the oppressed party, i.e., the relative increase in muscle is accompanied by a relative decrease in the ability of the mind and perception.

Primitive muscle is associated with beliefs that are mostly religious, which recognize and practice oppression in a way that reflects it and does not contradict it. For example, the values ​​produced by this religious belief say that kicking and humiliating the woman is an honor for him and for her. Part of the honor for her is considering her to be deficient in intellect, and part of the honor for her is freeing her from performing the duties of marital partnership, Not performing the duties of partnership means her comfort, and her comfort means honoring her, For example, considering her testimony to be equivalent in value to the testimony of half a man is a human consideration for her weak memory by birth. Here, the doctrine confuses the subject of intellect and muscle, for the intellect is not muscle, and the functions of the intellect, i.e. memory, are very different from the functions of muscle. Scientifically, a woman’s memory is deeper and broader than a man’s memory!

  The pretense of honoring women has no connection whatsoever to caring for them or being concerned about them, but rather to fearing them, especially in an era where physical strength no longer holds any value, as muscular build no longer has that old value, Therefore, men fear for their muscular system, which women threaten with their intellect. Here, male chauvinism tries to further tighten its grip on women and attempt to bury them alive, that is, to bury their social gender, using all kinds of superstitions, manipulation, and obfuscation to the point of lying and intellectual and moral hypocrisy. All of this was a great lie, no less than a crime against humanity. Religious thought helped commit this crime, disguised with angelic masks, while in reality it is criminal and satanic, with a psychological readiness to practice violence in its various forms, from verbal to physical, Religion stood in the way of women with dozens of weapons, such as the weapon of allowing men to beat them, the weapon of depriving them of guardianship over children, then the weapon of the verse and guardianship, the weapon of monopolizing sexual pleasure, then the weapon of inheritance laws, even the weapon of imprisoning women in the home. Since she is not legally allowed to leave the house except with his permission, in addition to all of that and the like, there are many rulings that nullify the equality of women with men in rights and duties, Here we will go a little off topic to ask how equality can be achieved among members of society by the state authorities, when inequality is legitimized within the family!!!

  The Arab man is not born different from any other man, but he is educationally and environmentally very different from other people, The difference from others is mainly limited to the fact that his life is filled with coercive religious mechanisms that disrupt his intellectual independence, As long as the public stands by a religious viewpoint, this man or male finds it difficult to face several fronts at once: a front against the public and a front against his male ego, then the lack of courage to declare himself an infidel, in addition to the fact that he is originally a distorted male, intellectually swallowed up by the power of religion, which represents a cultural, heritage atmosphere and a social fabric unit as an inflated authority equipped with all the arts of intimidation, enticement and lying, It claims to provide free sacred services in exchange for obedience and submission to it and considering it to be the representative of right and truth, which falsehood cannot approach from any direction.

The popular collective sense wants to suggest that women are honored and respected, their social status is high, and their rights are protected, At the same time, the stereotypical treatment of them as creatures in the form of animals is concealed. They are bought, sold, and even slaughtered when necessary to protect what is called honor, The audacity of some, especially religious men, has reached the point of considering their captivity a virtue and a benefit to them, turning them into concubines for marriage as an honor for them, and beating them in the event of their refusal to have intercourse as a moral duty, as the jurists express daily and frankly. All of this, in their opinion, represents the exaltation of the word of God, which every person must believe in and practice what it contains of rules and rulings, and if he does not do that, his fate is hell and being burned in the fire.

  The truth is that we do not know of any murderer, criminal, or even mentally disturbed person in history who practiced what God Almighty wanted to practice in terms of punishment for those who disobeyed Him, God Almighty, as He acknowledges and admits, is a barking, bloodthirsty, murderous tyrant, the likes of whom humanity has never known. And in order to spread His criminal doctrine, He does not hesitate to commit any heinous crime, from killing the mind to annihilating the body to the rest of the forms of destruction and torture, which any earthly tyrant would be ashamed to practice,And whoever doubts this should compare that heavenly injustice and oppression with its earthly counterpart, as it is not common for an earthly tyrant to punish those who turn their backs on him with death, as is known about the ruling on apostasy. Nor does every tyrant on earth permit the blood of his opponents as the heavenly one permits this blood. And the majority of the prisoners of the earthly tyrant are not women, as Ibn Abdullah claimed regarding the inmates of the brothels of Hell.

There isn’t enough space to provide a complete comparison between the heavenly tyrant and the earthly tyrant, but overall, it can be acknowledged that the earthly tyrant is superior to the heavenly tyrant, especially morally and in other areas such as truth, mercy, and fairness, particularly the prospect of improved living conditions for people on Earth with the absence of the earthly tyrant due to death or other reasons, while the heavenly tyrant is eternal and everlasting, neither changing nor disappearing…