Between the French Revolution and the Ar’our rabble

  Samir Sadiq, Ruba Mansoor 

           Anyone who tries to meddle in complex and difficult issues without knowledge, culture, or understanding is assaulting reason and truth, An example of such ignoramuses is their comparison of the French Revolution to the Idlib-based banditry, The French Revolution, with its global impact, was a global revolution, yet these fools attempted to compare it to what they called the “Syrian Revolution.” Here, they transformed from ignoramuses into true ignoramuses, because there was no Syrian revolution at all, What happened in Syria was nothing more than a barbaric, ignoramus-like attack unrelated to revolutions, whose primary objective is to completely erase the negative aspects of the past and establish a new present and future entirely different from it, These ignoramuses dared to propose such a comparison and reduced the French Revolution to the guillotine, while even the former Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, in the 20th century, was unable to definitively assess the French Revolution because it was still ongoing, As the minister emphasized, it was too early to evaluate it, even though it erupted more than two hundred years ago, Zhou justified It is difficult to assess that the French Revolution was one of the greatest revolutions in the world, which still positively influences human civilization to this day, The French Revolution changed the face of human history, and among the most important of these changes were the separation of religion from the state and the declaration of the rights of man, What Danton, Marat, and Robespierre did is not important, but rather what Rousseau wrote about the philosophy of the social contract, and then the support of great thinkers like Kant and many others for this revolution, The genocides in eastern, southern, and northern Syria were not carried out by the guillotine, but by the will of God!!!!

  We do not want to dwell on this point because a large portion of the Arab alphabet does not read, and if they read they do not understand, and if they understand they do not act, because they are disabled in perception, comprehension and understanding, So whoever compares Rousseau to Al-Arour is practicing intellectual rape, and whoever compares a revolution that changed the essence and face of human history for the better with the Stone Age rabble of Idlib does not know his elbow from his knee, and whoever compares a revolution that separated religion from the state and established secularism with the movement of the herds of sheikhs and their followers, who want every male to marry at least four women, and promise every male stud hundreds of virgins in Paradise, is nothing but an animalistic creature.

The attempt to compare is an act of unparalleled rudeness and ignorance,The French Revolution abolished divine law, while the sheikhs want to implement divine law, i.e., Sharia, The French Revolution was class-based, emphasizing the importance of the middle class of the people according to Aristotle’s classifications, while the Ar’our movement abolished the middle class,In Syria, the Uyghur and Chechen movements were active in the slaughter under the supervision of the criminal al-Julani, who, along with his brothers and relatives, stole everything and deposited it in the banks of Turkish Northern Cyprus, We learned from the French Revolution the concept of the social contract (Rousseau), which the civilized world still works with to this day, As for what was called the Syrian mob’s chaos, we only learned about the Ar’our in terms of thought. Did Ar’our have a mind in his head to think or produce thought?

What happened in Syria was a handover from one gang to another, while the French Revolution was accompanied by giant developments such as the Declaration of the Rights of Man and setbacks such as the return of the monarchy (Napoleon) and then its removal, What the Syrian barbarity accomplished was nothing but looting and slaughter, and then the establishment of a religious state, while the French Revolution abolished the religious state, We do not want to elaborate further in responding to the ignorance that some of the ignorant have spewed forth!

Many Arabists boast about murderers and criminals like Ibn al-Walid, Uqba ibn Nafi, Saladin, Ibn Taymiyyah, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Khomeini, Qaradawi, and others who are mentally ill, If some of them could decipher even the most basic alphabetic ability, they would spit in the face of that so-called educated person, who remains utterly ignorant, If there were people among those herds who could read and understand, they would demand that these self-proclaimed intellectuals be placed in psychiatric hospitals, How can one compare a terrorist movement adopted by mosques and religious figures, in which thousands are led astray by the idea of ​​four wives and seventy virgins in Paradise, rivers of wine, and the enslavement of women and captives on Earth, along with a culture of anal sex, genital mutilation, death, and Sharia law, with a revolution that arose to eliminate the influence of religious figures in France and Europe and led to the application of human rights law, while religious figures in this region want to apply rigid, heavenly laws? How can we understand the recent ban on the sale of alcoholic beverages when God Almighty promises believers in Paradise is filled with rivers of wine!

Ignoring history is an individual error, especially if that individual is educated and theoretically has the ability to research and investigate in a free information space that allows him to obtain knowledge, This ignorance in itself is a sin for peoples as entities that must have a history, History is not a narrative of events, but primarily the making of events, Whoever does not make the event or influence it is considered passive and deficient and cannot be trusted to manage the affairs of homelands and peoples and influence the destinies of homelands and peoples.

The people of this region are characterized by their inability to read, and if they read, they don’t understand, and if they understand, they don’t act, This is because, like any herd, they suffer from an inflated instinct for blind obedience, coupled with an intense attachment to a miserable past created by their ancestors, These ancestors installed gods over them whose sole purpose was to despise them and instill in them a complex of idleness, ineffectiveness, and a lack of decision-making power,This was further reinforced by absurdities such as the verse telling them they must eat at home and enter the toilet with either their right or left foot, Even the absence of toilets at that time didn’t raise any suspicion or doubt in their minds. Examples of such trivialities and absurdities that negate the will of those who have lost their minds are numerous. What initiative can be expected from a people so prostrate, submissive, and stripped of their will in a way that negates their intellect and personality? Creatures of this kind cannot revolt, nor can they create a new reality, Revolution means creating a new reality, different to the point of contradiction from the old one, So, what is new inThe al julani? What is new in al julani ? There is nothing new except the declaration of the reincarnation of the Umayyads, Ruminating on the past is not a revolution, so it is not possible to talk about a revolution that is 15 years old, Rather, we must talk about mob rule and the practice of crime, savagery and sabotage for 15 years, The French Revolution did not break out in 1799 in response to the ringing of church bells, unlike the movements of sabotage and crime in this country, which came in response to the takbir from the mosques, Before the French Revolution, philosophers like Voltaire and Rousseau thought, while before the process of crime and sabotage in this country, Ar’our, Abu Amsha and Abu Dujana thought, Then the criminals of the Uyghurs, Chechnya and others applied Ar’our’s philosophy, which said years ago, there is no problem if a third of the Syrian people are exterminated as long as two-thirds of them remain alive from among the pious believers.

While philosophers in Europe laid the foundations of a social contract, the “revolution” of the A’arour-Al-Julani became pregnant and gave birth to a mouse that it called elections and a People’s Assembly, while in reality it was appointments, Massacres were committed east, west, north, and south in the name of combating remnants, They set out from the temples, and whoever wants freedom does not set out from places of worship that represent centers of manufacturing slavery, Religious slavery does not create civilization, because civilization is social, while religion has no relation to the concept of society, Religious affiliation or religion in general is a framework for the individual’s interaction with the unseen, There is no religious society, but rather religious individuals or groups, Here the muslim  Brotherhood hit the mark by naming their movement the movement of the people of the Sunnah and the community.

Revolutions know nothing more than setbacks, This was the case with the French Revolution, which, ten years after its outbreak, allowed an imperial officer, Napoleon Bonaparte, to rule the country, then fall, be exiled, escape from exile, return as emperor once again, be defeated at Waterloo, be exiled once again, and die in exile for the first and last time.

A thug seeking to revive the legacy of the Umayyad dynasty cannot be considered a revolutionary; rather, he should be described as an enemy of any revolution, Thuggery does not create revolutions, Even genuine revolutions require corrective movements, Castro was a true revolutionary, but he transformed into a kind of prophet after insisting on remaining president for 60 years, and then his brother assumed the presidency, Here, no correction occurred! Revolutions evolve, and no matter how high an individual’s capacity for development, it remains a dwarf compared to the scale of the development of nations, This applies to Arab rulers, especially those who call themselves “revolutionaries” and have turned themselves into sacred deities, Deities do not revolt against themselves, and the sacred does not revolt against its own stagnation. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *