Anyone who tries, without knowledge, culture and understanding, to stick their nose into difficult and complex issues is attacking reason and truth, An example of these local pseudo-begs is their interference in the issue of the French Revolution and its evaluation, which is considered, by its effects, a global revolution, These fools tried to compare the French Revolution with what they called the Syrian Revolution, Here, they transformed from pseudo-begs to real begs, because there is no Syrian revolution at all, and what happened in Syria was nothing but a barbaric, arrogant attack that had nothing to do with revolutions, whose mission was to completely erase the bad past, then establish a new situation completely different from the previous situation, The begs dared to put forward this approach and reduce the French Revolution to the guillotine, while the Chinese Prime Minister Zhou Enlai in the twentieth century was unable to evaluate the French Revolution finally, because it was still ongoing, and it was too early to evaluate it, as the Foreign Minister confirmed, despite the fact that it broke out more than two hundred years ago, Zhou Enlai justified the difficulty of evaluation by saying that the French Revolution was one of the largest revolutions in the world, ,which still has a positive impact on human civilization until now, The French Revolution changed the human history, and one of the most important of these changes was the separation of religion and state, It is not important what the guillotine of Danton, Marat and Robespierre did, but what Rousseau wrote about the philosophy of the social contract, then the support of great thinkers such as Kant and many others for this revolution, We do not want to prolong this point because a large portion of Arab alphabetists do not read, and if they do read, they do not understand because they are handicapped in perception, comprehension and understanding, Whoever compares Rousseau to theAl Aroor is practicing intellectual rape, Whoever compares a revolution that changed the   human history to the rabble of Idlib does not know his elbow from his toe, Whoever compares a revolution that separated religion from the state and established secularism with a bandit movement of sheikhs and their followers, who want every male to marry at least four women, and promise every male stallion hundreds of houris in heaven, is closer to animals than to humans.

Trying to compare is incomparable impudence and ignorance, The French Revolution suspended divine law, while the sheikhs in the Middle East want to implement divine law, i.e. Sharia, The French Revolution was a class revolution, emphasizing the importance of the middle class of the people according to Aristotle’s classifications, As for Syria, the Uyghur and Chechen movement and their likes from the Arab Syrians – the Brotherhood were active in slaughter, We learned from the French Revolution the concept of what was called the social contract (Rousseau), which the civilized world works with until this hour, As for what was called the chaos of the Syrian rabble, we did not know, from an intellectual perspective, anyone other than Al-Arour, Was there a mind in Al-Arour’s head to produce thought? What happened in Syria was a handover from one gang to another, while the French Revolution was accompanied by global disputes with England, for example, What the Syrian barbarism achieved was nothing but looting and slaughter, then an attempt to establish a religious state, while the French Revolution abolished the religious state, We do not want to expand further in responding to the ignorance that some have vomited , What we have read of the stunned ones regarding the comparison has caused great psychological frustration.

Many Arabists boast of murderers and criminals such as Ibn al-Walid, Uqba ibn Nafi, Salah al-Din al-Ayyubi, Ibn Taymiyyah, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Khomeini, al-Qaradawi and other mentally ill people, If some were able to decipher the word and letter with a minimum of    intelligence, they would spit in the face of that educated person who remained absolutely ignorant, If there were people among those herds who read and understand, they would demand that these clever savages be thrown into mental hospitals, How can we compare a terrorist movement adopted by mosques and clerics, in which thousands of those who practice masturbation are driven to imagine four wives and seventy houris in heaven with rivers of wine, not to mention the right hand possessions and captives on earth? How can we compare the movement of the culture of the anus and vagina with a revolution that arose to eliminate the influence of clerics and get rid of the ideas of men as legislation in the country and to rely on human law after the failure of divine law in managing people’s affairs?!   

Ignoring history is an individual mistake, especially if the individual is educated and theoretically has the ability to research and investigate in an information space that allows everyone the freedom to obtain information , However, this same ignorance is considered a sin for peoples who must have a history, and history is not a narration of events, but rather primarily the making of events, Whoever does not make an event or influence it is considered a reactive, limited person who cannot be trusted to manage the affairs of nations and peoples and influence the destinies of nations and peoples.

The people of the region are characterized by not reading, and if they do read they do not understand, and if they do understand they do not work, because they are afflicted, like any herd, with an enlarged gland of the instinct of submission like a herd, then a strong attachment to a past made by others, and the installation of gods from among them, whose only concern is to despise them and to establish in them a complex of idleness, ineffectiveness and lack of decision, For example, the verse tells them that they must eat in their homes and that they must enter the bathroom with their right or left foot, Even the absence of bathrooms at that time did not arouse in the mind of these dumb people any suspicion or doubt, There are many examples of such completely mind-numbing nonsense, What initiative can be expected from a people who are prostrate, submissive and stripped of their will in this way that nullifies their personality? Creatures of this type do not revolt and are unable to create a new reality, and revolution means creating a new reality that is different to the point of contradicting the older reality, So what is new al julani? What is the innovation  with his dectatourship? There is nothing new except calling the old by a new name,Ruminating over the past is not a revolution, so we cannot talk about a 14-year-old revolution, but rather we must talk about mob rule and the practice of crime, savagery and sabotage for 14 years, The French Revolution did not erupt in 1799 in response to the ringing of church bells, unlike the movements of sabotage and crime in this region, which came in response to the call to gross  god, Before the French Revolution, philosophers like Voltaire and Rousseau thought, while before the criminality and sabotage in this region and this country, Al-Arour, Abu Amsha and Abu Dujana thought, Then the criminals of the Uyghurs, Chechens and other Syrian Arabists and Brotherhood members applied Al-Arour’s philosophy, which said years ago that there is no problem in exterminating a third of the Syrian people, when two-thirds of the pious believers remain alive.

In Europe, philosophers laid the foundations of a social contract, while the revolution of the one-eyed Al-Julani became pregnant and gave birth to a mouse that they recently called elections, but in reality it was appointments, Massacres were committed in the east, west, north and south in the name of fighting the remnants, They started from the temples, and whoever wants freedom does not start from the houses of worship that represent the centers of the slavery industry, and religious slavery does not create civilization, because civilization is social, while religion has no relation to the concept of society, Religious affiliation, or religion in general, is a framework for the individual’s personal interaction with the unseen, There is no religious society, but rather for individuals or religious groups, Here, the Brotherhood was   right with  the name of the Sunnis and religious  group>Revolutions know nothing more than hardships, and this was the case with the French Revolution, which, ten years after its outbreak, allowed an imperial officer, Napoleon Bonaparte, to rule the country, Then he fell, was exiled, and fled from exile, only to return as emperor once again, only to be defeated at Waterloo, exiled once again, and die in exile for the first time.

A thug who wants to revive the Umayyad heritage cannot be considered a revolutionary, Rather, he should be described as being against any revolution, Thugs do not create revolutions, Even real revolutions need corrective revolutions, Castro was a true revolutionary, but he turned into something similar to the prophets after he insisted on remaining president for 60 years, after which his brother took over the presidency, The revolution develops, and no matter how high an individual’s capacity for development and progress increases, it remains a limited, backward dwarf compared to the size of the people’s developments, The same applies to Arab rulers, especially the revolutionary ones among them at the beginning, who turned themselves into sacred gods in the end, Gods do not revolt against themselves, and the sacred does not revolt against its own stagnation.