Maha Bitar, Syriano
It is no wonder that the spread of totalitarian culture in the Mohammedansocieties, especially the Arab, a culture based on violence and the abolition of the other, and resulted from the deposits of purity, determinism, aggression, violence, terrorism, hatred, revenge and the tendency of exclusion of the Bedouin, all of which contributed to the crystallization of the current Arab Mohammedan personality
All of this began before the call and moved a lot of it to religion after the call, which gave the culture of totalitarian holiness and divine legitimacy, the new religion has organized the Bedouin things without a fundamental change from ignorance, what is important was the invasion and the spoils of war and how to deal with the spoils of war, especially dividing them in devotion and encouraging proportions of looting, theft and piracy, the new doctrine, which recommended the prohibition of evil practiced evil, and developed to divide the spoils of war rules and provisions, instead of forbidding theft, theft was legitimized and sanctified to the degree of deification, said the verse … And eat from what you are halal, any spoils of war Halal Zalal, what a shame
The nomadism was a coercive social situation imposed by the harsh nature of the desert, neither water nor all, drought and a painstaking struggle to secure the necessities of life, wars that never stopped between tribes because of competition and disputes over the spoils, which rooted the spirit of revenge, invasion, murder, arrogance, violence and racism in the Bedouin soul, in addition to the practice of other deniers such as polygamy and contempt for women being weaker than men and less able to use the sword and collect the spoils, that is, the values of muscle strength, overcoming and oppression of the Bedouin
The Bedouin was very influenced by the feudalism produced by the Al-Maghazi economy after the Bedouin invasion of the East and the West, which proceeded from the concept of the right of power instead of the concept of the power of the right, the consideration of the spoils was a halal in application of the right of muscular power, that is, the right of mastery, oppression and overcoming, which was practiced by the conquerors and the workers of the Caliph such as Khalid Ibn Al-Walid, Uqba bin Nafi’ and Musa bin Nasir and others, for each of them was given a city or a region to practice what he wanted of the looting and looting within the framework of the Caliph or even with the son of Abdullah, God and his messengers, the fifth of the spoilers got the same
The Bedouin was defeated despite the conquests and military victories, the military victory is very different from the success in life, the defeat of the Bedouin has nothing to do with the corruption of urbanization, especially in this era, which refused to take from it, and does not lie in moving away from religion, but primarily in the economy of Al-Maghazi, which established the social historical blockage and therefore of an isolationist process that did not benefit others and benefited from others only in material aspects such as tribute, the meeting with the peoples of the colonies was not accompanied by a creative interaction, the peoples of the colonies were the highest civilization of the invaders, and the invaders could learn from the peoples of the Levant, the peoples of Egypt, India, the Berber peoples and others, the contact with the peoples of the colonies was limited to the economy of the Magazi, the tribute and the collection of others by force
In the medium and long term, these invasions, which were accomplished with amazing speed, led to the construction of a giant empire, and led at the same time to the disintegration of that empire quickly and in various forms, for example, the differences, wars and agricultural paralysis that affected the population of the Levant, who were active before the occupation of their country in agriculture and the rest of other aspects of life, this returned to the attention of the Romans to the canals of irrigation, urbanization, construction and all other aspects of life, and there was no such exhausting tribute, there was an artistic life and theaters and there was a thought and thinkers from the people of the Levant, there was also Syrian tsars in Rome and then jurists, so that it can be said that the Roman law in force until now was the work of Syrian jurists such as Banipal and others, the Romans did not rely on the tribute and the spoils of war and did not distinguish between the Syrian and the Roman, they were all subjected to one law
The Hejazi Caliphate can be likened to the Ottoman Sultanate, and as the Ottoman Sultanate ruled itself, the Hejazi Caliphate also eliminated itself, i.e. at the hands of its nomadism and productive sterility, the invaders did not produce anything but the rivers of blood and destruction, unlike the treasury of the Caliphate, i.e. the House of Money, which was full of loot, which the new doctrine began ways to obtain it by force and then distribute it with the rules of division between the thieves and the leadership of the thieves on the principle of Ali Baba and the forty Harami, Omar Ibn Al-Khattab was like a father, and we ask today about the source of the finances of his succession, is not the money of his money from the spoils of war !!!, We do not know another source
This point reminded us of one of the Salafist clowns, who explicitly promoted two invasions annually in Europe after Ibn Abdullah, who made two invasions annually, in order to reform the Egyptian economic situation, Omar Ibn al-Khattab died, but he is still alive with the person of Sheikh Al-Huwaini, who invented the idea of invading Europe, Al-Huwaini did not forget the daughters of Asfar, promising to kidnap some of them in his foray, and then made plans to sell them or gift them or put them at the disposal of his guests for a while, imitating the son of Abdullah in his forays
How did the houses of the money of the caliphs be filled, and from what sources?, The source of money except the property and money of the victims and then the sale of the captives as goods and other practices of thieves, the legislation of the “sacred” texts of lootes and thefts and the development of provisions to divide them between God and His Messenger and the warriors was an encourager to the warriors, apparently God was a partner in theft and trafficking in sinfuls or the acquisition of the king of the right
The history of religions does not know a case of this kind, and those who want to learn more in detail about the spoils of war and the wealth of Ibn Abdullah should review the books of the forty Waqdi regarding the biography of the Prophet and the sources of the Prophet’s wealth
Post Views: 327