Maha Bitar, Ruba Mansour:
There is no doubt about the importance of national identity , and there is no doubt that it is an expression of the characteristics of a people or a group, in addition to being an incubator of an advanced and high horizon, a horizon chosen by man voluntarily and with conviction, in practice, there is no people without an optional identity, except for some colonies, on which the colonizer imposed his identity, and this is not permissible, every colonialism without right, even if it is said that it was conquered by the order of God, conquest does not mean only occupation, but owning the new land, which is considered a halal war spoil for those who sheep and stole it, and because the conquest is an occupation that was prevented by the League of Nations almost a century ago
The identity of the Bedouin conquerors has imposed on the inhabitants of the Levant language, religion and social life, such as polygamy and the other forms of marriage, which are considered as a slave rather than marriage such as the marriage of pleasure and others, and then politically through the authority of the religious-world caliphate and through practices represented by the contents of the brutal age covenant, people lived in oppression and humiliation and payment of tribute , Then either Islamization or war !! , The people of alphabet did not have any possibility to defend themselves against the people of the sword , The victory in the war is usually for the people of the sword, especially when the military possibilities are limited to the sword , By the sword slaughtered everyone who stood in their face , The number of massacres of Ibn al-Walid for example exceeded hundreds of thousands , As many sheikhs acknowledged a lot of pride and pride , The army of Ibn al-Walid or the army of Uqba bin Nafi or Amro Ibn al-Aas are not different from others , all of them were killers of a kind , made my livelihood under my spear
The Bedouin occupation left a heritage, the Arabs carried a list after the establishment of the Sykes-Picot countries, and ruled in its name and in the implicit or declared partnership with the muslim Brotherhood in various forms in various countries that emerged after the First World War, and in a moment called the moment of historical kidnapping, these people managed to devote Arabism, which turned with a huge amount of lies and promises to the identity of these peoples, peoples tried Arabism and gave them a lot of opportunities, and forgiven their mistakes, but it was proved to these peoples recently that Arabism was an empty drum, a drum for salvation unity and the result was fragmentation, a drum for prosperity, and the result was poverty , a drum for democracy and dictatorship was the result, a drum for liberation and as Arabism becomes an internal colonialism worse than external colonialism
So Arabism went bankrupt as an identity, died and was buried, and replaced by the identity such as the Syrian identity and the Egyptian identity and others, any proven identities were very successful, and for many reasons can be expected to succeed in the present and in the future, these identities represent a process of liberation from the Arabist disease, because it is very different from this Arab Bedouin disease, it was a revolution on the Arabist disease or the Arab heritage, which must be disposed of by any means, the disposal has succeeded partially so far, as there are very large social changes, there is no longer anyone who carries the banner of Arabism such as the Baath and the Nasserist Socialist Union and others, they have become extinct and buried on the dustbins of history
As for history and the so-called common history, the Levant did not have a common history with the Bedouin , because the common assumes the existence of partnership or participation in the making of existence, no partnership between the occupation colonialism of the Kingdom of bedouin and the peoples of the Syrian colony or the colony of the Levant, which did not know of the Bedouin conqueror only control, injustice and application of what came in the brutal age period, unlike the situation with the Bedouin , the situation of the Levant with Rome was different and based on equality in the law, which equaled between Rome and the rest of the empire, and as a result, Rome ruled several Syrian and non-Syrian , and then that the drafting of Roman law was through Syrians in the , such as Banipal, still European laws are called Roman laws, the kaiser chair was not limited to the Syrians, but there were Yemenis and Libyans also, the urbanism was equal in the same way
