Maha Bitar, Syriano
The Arab-Mohammadi fascination with the 
thinker Le Bone is due to the similarity of intellectual stereotypes, we will mention some of these stereotypes, such as the pattern of considering the invasion and conquest a natural right, Le Bon in Europe in the period of intensification of the conflict between two theses, the first was the thesis of those who say equality of humanity and human rights, and the second was the thesis of self-conclusion and then racism, ethnicity and human differences, that time was the beginning of capitalism, which received leadership from feudalism, here he sided with the racial party against the equality team, but considered equality between human beings, that it is a human being.
The divisions of Le Bon were based on the factor of ability to suppress and seize, that is, his divisions saw that the worldly societies were non-war societies, which did not care about the sword and wars, but with civil crafts and sophistication and considered the looting and theft and the so-called spoils of war are not of virtue by anything, so the Bedouin culture preserved his saying regarding the conquests “and what history knew a merciful conqueror of the Arabs” !!!, That is, it is enough or be kind to some thing in order to have the right to “open” the areas of others and seize their property and then kill them and slaughter them, mercy is relative and means that your slaughter of 40000 Shami is like a kind of mercy, when you have swords that enable you to slaughter 8000 of them, so mercy is relative, and its standard is relative, and it is a relative, for the sake of Yadu and He said that Ibn ‘A’ānā‘ was a mercissssser.
The Arabs have met with the intellectual carcass of Le Bon on several occasions, for example, they met with him in the point of the good of a nation, the best of a nation remains the best nation even if it destroys itself and destroys others even if it is stolen and looted and forced people to pay tribute by hand while they are small, the campaign of the soul represented the higher societies and the campaign of crafts were from the failed lower societies, in the divisions of Le Bon and in his testimony regarding the mercy of the conquerors we see proof that Mr. Le Bon was only a predatory monster, confirmed in another field was the field of women’s rights, and since he rejected equality between men and women, and refused to recognize the humanity of women and their equality with the rights with men, but considered that the good lies in not being educated and ignorant, saying if what is written by the woman, the European will turn into a European in a dreamer. Don’t you seem to have the psychological differences between them for all those with eyes?”
Le Bon stressed that it is not possible to apply the great humanitarian principles to all human beings, there are, according to his opinion, peoples who do not deserve what other peoples deserve, even the science that some peoples deserve are not worthy of other peoples, so Le Bon developed the concept of dividing peoples into four primitive, religious, middle and higher types, and classified the Arab conquerors in the category of middle veins, which made a civilization that was surpassed only by Europeans, here he denied that the Arabs are the best nation, despite considering it “race” is a fate that cannot be changed, and denied that some peoples were able to rise from the inferior class to a better class, because this upgrading represents only an external coating that does not affect their internal essence, which even education is unable to overcome it, as he put it, so Mr. Gustave Le Bon on behalf of history decided that non-European peoples do not deserve equality and do not deserve the basis.
It is no wonder that the Arabs rejoice of the team of the seal of the prophets and the conclusion of religions and then the best nation with ideas of this kind, and it is no wonder that they occupy and open because the spoils are a natural right for them and all the world for them, and the dissemination of their religion by the sword is a natural right for them, tribute and paid by a small hand their right and the captivity of their right, and the inequality between the believer and the infidel their right, it is their destiny to be above and the fate of others to be under, as Hitler and Nazism saw, which has the right to a decent place under the sun, and where is the problem in taking Poland, for example!
Generally, we see a correspondence between Le Bonn’s view of history and the view of the Arabs regarding authoritarianism, fatalism, rights and equality, on the other hand, it seems that what Le Bon promoted does not agree with what human thought has reached today, that is, it stood in the face of the movement of history, as Nazism stood and stood and stood and Arabism, this means that they failed, as a result of which Nazism became extinct where it was born, and the Arabs are on their way to extinction where they were born…
Post Views: 361