Maria Salem,Ma bitar :
- It is rare that there are societies that are tight to their past in this era, similar to what it is in Arab groups, here the essence of the past is grabbed by the essence of the present, and determines the shape and features of the future, here the dead are lying on the living, drawing their course and determining the quality of theirambitionsand future.
- Despite the enormous scientific progress and intensive communication between peoples thanks to modern technologies, the decision of Arab closure has not changed and thus getting out of history and the vomiting of the past, and not paying attention to the present and the future, but by stillness in the swamp of stagnation and surrendering to cultures that were in their historical context late, and their relative delay increases with time despite some manifestations of modernization, which does not mean modernity, because modernization is bought with money, and money in this region is petroleum, not made by the Arabs, so they did not discover it and did not extract it from the ground until they did not market it, do not buy modernity with money It is made in minds and formulated in the form of ideas.
- To establish the Arab reality in the past, features, causes, consequences and manifestations, the causes are not genive and have nothing to do with the membership of the human being called Arab (the Arabs are the inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula only), this person was genive like others, but his circumstances are different from the circumstances of others, and one of the circumstances is geographical, such as his presence in the desert, which he cannot change and can change, that is, by virtue of the circumstances of the tyrannical desert he must practice surrender to it.
- 1440 years ago, Dina was born in a desert model, expressed by the phrase “Islam, I surrender”, that is, and just as the desert is insurable to change, this religion must be stubborn to change and development, so it was attached to it, especially or the adjective of “holy”, the sacred quality that is disabled by its nature for reform and development, and disrupting reform and development requires neutralizing the mind or paralysis and dealing with it as an unnecessary surplus, that is, it is absent or has become absent, practically put inside a prison, and it is logical then that the mind is guarded in its prison by the unreasonable in order to prevent reason From the inflance, any metaphorically the attempt to liberate, irrationality means superstition, faith, definality, unsecult, legends and residence outside of time, the mind of the insane refuses to take responsibility for the miserable conditions it caused, so there must be an accused! Here was the conspiracy, which was born from the Western womb and from Western interests according to their claim, as if it is a shame for man to have interests to defend, and interests are despicable forms and types, including criminal despicable, such as conquests, including what is more moderate or less pretense, one of the most despicable types of attack on others, the conquests were motivated by the spoils of war, and not for the aim of spreading religion, When the conquests began, there was no religion!, and the spread of religion was not done by military aggression against others and killing people.
- The unreasonable, the producer of the unseen, produced absoluteism, schizophrenia, and the enemy of science and materialism. Hostility to science and materialism means the owners of science and materialism, which was manifested by the killing of the overwhelming majority of the men of science, most of whom came from the colony of Persia, which had an advanced civilization and very different from the decadent Bedouin culture in the Arabian Peninsula.
- To kill the Persian scholars within the framework of the rejection of science, backgrounds and motives that do not differ from the mechanisms and motives that managed to thwart the Renaissance project in the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century. The pioneers of the Renaissance at that time tried to break the flawed ring of the past inherited from a defective past, by preaching new methods in dealing critically with the textual sacred to break the caves of the Stone Age and break ostification, but they failed for many reasons, including the inability of the religious Saharawi to interact with their ideas and endeavors, then accusing them of heresy and deviation from the text that was said to be strong, from them Muhammad Abdo, Taha Hussein and others. In this attempt, rationality lost the battle of urbanization, but it regained some of its strength, especially during World War I and immediately after the elimination of the Ottoman Sultanate and the establishment of many countries according to Sykes-Picot. These countries had many elements of success, which began to retre immediately after their birth, especially after 1928. The result was now seen in the countries of Sykes-Picot, which are flocking in the swamp of tyranny and moving from delay to delay, and from criminal primitive to criminal religious Bedouin.
- All this can only be explained by the obsession with residence in the unhapy past, which obscured the vision of the world’s developments and keeping pace with these developments, although these developments and changes enabled the private life of many people of the Levant, especially Syria and Lebanon, and without permission.
- Unimaginable things happen in the twenty-first century, as an example of the rule of the mullahs in Iran, the Popular Mobilization in Iraq, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Al-Nusra Group in Syria, along with kings and princes, who proved their advance on the so-called Republicans, is a strange and strange thing that we did not expect and we did not expect the president of the Republic to be a king of inheritance and keen to revive the past such as the Baath and the Akhongians, for example, and why insist on reviving the past and that snooping on the past? And is there any benefit from that past, which prevailed 1440 years ago and for 1440 years, and was primitive, a bloody tribal criminal decade (Red River), a liar, a liar about the spread of religion, and why should religion spread by the sword? And can the invasion continue as a way of life? And does the morals of the invasion deserve to be preserved, revived or reactivated again? Is the renaissance possible after the invasion completed destroying the invaders humanely and curbing their development and breaking their morals and progress for their dependence on tribute, looting and the spoils of war in financing their lives and needs? In light of the trick of the culture of death wrapped in the culture of jihad and the culture of martyrdom in order to spend a life in heaven between thighs and in the smults of hundreds of virgin nymids? The superstitious religion that embraced all this must answer all these questions, and provide one proof of the truth of what he promised and what destroyed the truth of the life of the mujahideen and the lives of the oppressed from their victims at the same time.
- The life of jihad, martyrdom, and reliance on the unseenness of Paradise and its myths, the myth of God’s support for the believers, then the concepts of judgment, destiny, the murderous faith of reason, and the constants that hinder development, led to the defeat of the modernity project in this region. Paradise was a reality in modernity and not in the seventh heaven, instead of increasing efforts to revive modernity on earth and adhere to it, there was a kind of dedication of addiction to delay, which manifested itself in delinquency to more worship, submission, and the growing presence of superstition, legends and ocult. In short, Ibn Abdullah returned to the concept of paradise, fire, martyrdom and magnification, and the hordes of madness creped towards Chairs to sit on and to change the concept of the state or homeland to a state or succession, not a service to the homeland but to religion. Misguidance has become a name for enlightenment, and misguidance is a charge in a religious state that considers the citizen as a servant of religion and not to the homeland, which has hostility as it was hostility to idols, so the subject of national education was canceled from the teaching curricula, because what unites the people of a country from this region is religion and not the homeland, and what non-Sunni Mohammedans do in this country? Here we return to the phrase mentioned at the beginning of the article “convert to islslam …and you are safe or emigrate !! He emigrated to those who believe that the homeland gathers, not religion.
Post Views: 10