About the way it must be said that your mother, sister, honor and dignity must participate in the discussion with the brotherhood, who have no way or way of discussing except the market exposure of the mother, sister and dignity, as for the goal of the discussion that must be the result of a new thought and position, the brothers do not want in principle what is new, the discussion with them has a spelling formula for what they believe, and how they can develop their ideas when those ideas are “holy”, so that the expression of any contrary opinion or does not represent their sanctities consider it as a disbelief, here is a cruelty and contempt for religion and a lack of literature and work for Zionism and the foment of sedition … A crime worthy of punishment, the dissenting opinion is immediately obtained by insulting it and trying to exclude it, who adopts our opinion for the same weapons, and what we want to be a comprehensive debate and the same as the discussion of the same.
The punishment of the other opinion is not limited to the pasting of the aforementioned accusations, but it may develop bloodily and may end with the establishment of the limit on the “infidel” the perpetrator where he is killed, and the examples of killing more than that, if they are not killed, what they call “apostate” is killed, it becomes to be executed socially, and social execution is dedicated to women .. Randa is a priest of a whore and Rosa Yassin Hassan also and Samar Yazbek as well, not to mention the whore of Suheir Al-Atasi and the prostitute of May Skaf and Rasha Imran and every woman who has a contrary opinion of their opinion who is a whore, who wants to oblige a woman to veil considers her naked even though she wears an ordinary dress, the brother has seen the wife of the late Shukri al-Quwatli “naked” in an old photo recently published, and the naked is an animal, because the animal does not wear clothes like a goat.
The controversy and the fight with the brotherhood is disgusting and stubborn and its results are shallow, it is difficult to practice intellectual circulation with a party that has no idea except verses in addition to the superiority of being like their verses sacred in addition to being the best nation that monopolizes the truth, and others have nothing but error and hostility and then hatred for religion.
Despite all this, it is inevitable to confront them and bear their market, and the pessimism may be exaggerated, who looks at the reality now clearly sees their expected erosion resulting from their stiffness on the rigidity, closure, blockage and narrow-mindedness, the closure of the horizon weakness and openness strength, especially since there is no society or group homogeneous absolute, and can not impose absolute homogeneity on the difference and absolute difference, difference is not only a reality, but also a right.
There is no state according to the modern concept of it without equality between all, and there is no question of the quality of “Is the believer equal with the infidel!, As there is no infidel and there is no believer regarding citizenship and the homeland, in the homeland there is a “citizen” regardless of his non-political affiliation such as religious affiliation, and in every country in the world there is in the broad outline of one law is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and all local laws should not conflict with this declaration, especially the countries that signed the declaration and approved it, and the United Nations is able to force the signatory countries to commit to the declaration, and the examples of this are many, including the obligation of Saudi Arabia and Egypt years ago to cancel the markets of slavery, and then oblige Mali to this abolition, i.e. obliging countries to do so in the language of Jean-Jacques Roussseau, all of this represents a pious opportunity from disaster, realistically, the Middle East groups seem to be delinquent to the drought, unfortunately
Vitality is one of the connotations and attributes of the debate, only when this debate is subject to the judgments of ethics as a method and to the provisions of the goal of reaching a new opinion and a new position, but the discussion with the brotherhood is far from vitality and close to the animal because it does not adhere to the moral method and does not aim to produce a new opinion and position.