The question of the veil and the rest of the manifestations that are considered religious
hypocrites in recent decades, from what we consider to be rattle before the final death, the advocates of the veil ask the question, does the removal of the veil make the glory?, Then they donate the answer to the question they asked in the negative, trying to prove the validity of their position by providing some examples of veiled women who made glory according to their assessment of glory, which they considered a personal phenomenon, such as considering the heroism as a personal phenomenon, but glory and heroism are not personal phenomena, but social phenomena, it cannot be said that glory was made in Egypt because so-and-so has been obscured or so-called veiled, Egypt and other Arab countries socially delayed, and for delay hundreds of reasons, including the recent ventation that has spread more than its spread in Egypt in the days of Saad Zaghloul!
If the glory is social, the decline and fall of nations or peoples is also social, and it is not permissible to suspend social failure on the veil only, but this does not mean that the veil does not consecrate the disruption of the mind and thus contributes to the perpetuation of the fall and failure, comparing Egypt with Japan makes it a little clear, Egypt’s natural or esoteric wealth is greater than the wealth of Japan, but religion and religion and their accessories in Japan are less in the degrees of religion and religion and their accessories in Egypt and the difference here between 100% religion and its annexes in Egypt compared to 0% religion and religion and their annexes in Japan, because of religion, religion, veil and other annexes, which is reflected in the production of the Egyptian society compared to Japanese, in this regard there is many questions, such as the establishment of the husband, the treatment of the woman, and their population of religion and the human being, their religion, and the human being, because of their relationship, and the human being, the nature of the woman, in a way, in the way of the decline of the production of the Egyptian society, in this regard, the relationship of the husband, and the fact that the woman produces the same, the treatment and the human being, because of their religion and the human rights, in the way of the female, the subjuntance of the woman, the sub-ordress of the woman, in the way of the subcontem of the production of the Egyptian society, and the vestrustion of the woman, and the fact that the woman in the way of the substancement of the production of the Egyptian society, in the way of the relationship, and the veilt of the woman, and the fact that the woman is transformed in the way of the marriage, and the vergenergion of the woman, and the fact that the woman is transformed in the way of the development of the woman, and the vesssisting, the female, and the female relationship, and the vesposite of the woman, in the way of the subconqustry of the woman, the fact that the woman is in the way of the subjudious, and the female relationship, and the femalesddy, and the female relationship, and the males, the females, and the female relationship, and the veileversion, and the humanity, in the way of the female society, and the vermin, and the humanes, the females, and the females, for the sub-dispurngurem of the Egyptian people, the nature of the women, the females, and the sub-humanity of the woman, the same of the relationship, and the ve
On the occasion of the subject of the veil, the following question must be asked, is the priority of form or reason and is veiling an imposition?, Is the removal of the veil and refusal to wear it by mistake, crime or misdemeanor as was the case in Saudi Arabia, and the criminalization of removing the veil or not wearing it is still a crime in Iran, Afghanistan and some other regions, on the other hand, there is a narrowing, taking a tightening against the veil and veil, because veiling is practically forced and intimidated by the wrath of God and punishment in hell, and so on, it is the banner of a black war against free will, the reason for the tightening of the veil in the world is not the dress in itself, but forcing women to wear a certain dress.
The strangest thing that was said in the controversy on the issue of removing the veil was what Sheikh Khaled al-Jindi, the former Grand Mufti of the Egyptian Republic, by inventing the term “insulting the veil” commenting on the fact that some girls took off the veil and released it in the air to fall on the ground, or removed it by force as it appeared in a picture of the Iranian Mahsa Amini, what the soldier said is scary, especially for the veil, that it is a declaration of war on them and directing the shares of social violence to their chests, Khaled El-Gendi not only the hypothesis of insulting, but expanded the sick hypothesis to consider the veil as a national flag, that is, the removal of the veil is similar to throwing the national flag in the garbage basket, that extremism represents the imposition of the veil a kind of blackmail and threat as expressed by Khaled al-Jindi by saying “Who insults the symbol insults Muslims and people his interest and destroy it”, the most correct if he said the opposite, that is, the punishment will be the opposite, that the punishment will be the opposite, and not that the punishment will be the opposite, that is, the punishment will be the opposite, that the veilt will be the opposite.Religious figures insist on the hijab because it distinguishes the Muslim woman from others, essentially serving as an identity.But what is the benefit of a harmful identity?Almost everywhere in the world, some people suffer because they are Muslims, as the label is associated not with positive things but with negative ones.Among the negatives are accusations of terrorism or illegal immigration, and the burden of costs associated with hosting refugees, which European nations must bear.A single refugee in Europe costs the state €5,400 per month.Therefore, they do not want… Nations bear the long-term expenses of millions of refugees, while Arab governments want the refugees to remain in Europe.This point, in particular, was at the heart of the current dispute between France and Algeria.France wants to deport some refugees, while Algeria wants these refugees to stay in France.How can we understand the actions of the Algerian government, which is not currently suffering from civil wars?What kind of state is this that refuses the return of its citizens to their homeland?Are there governments of countries that are more corrupt than the governments of Arab countries?
Why do most Arab refugees throw their papers into the seas before they reach the shores of Europe? They want to facilitate their asylum because they have become individuals without identity, the fact that the veil is an identity, as the sheikhs want, makes it difficult to obtain a residence permit, and therefore there is no social benefits, housing insurance, and so on, so the fact that the veil represents an identity is harmful to the veiled, which was forced by the government of its homeland to seek asylum, and the worst of this is the refusal of these countries to return refugees to their homeland, are there any despicable countries from those Arab countries
