Maha Bitar, Samir Sadiq:

          some insist in this miserable East on the description or definition of sexual life, which is not based on the rules and provisions of religion as a pornographic sexual life and that women then turn into commons, accused of pornography and commons here is sexual life in most parts of the world, especially in Europe.

There is a sexual freedom, but sexual freedom does not mean porn at all, but means attaining love, which turns sex into its highest form, the love inherent to sexual reproduction is the abolition of porn, who knows Europe recognizes sexual practices between males and females who love each other and agree with each other and have high sex with each other, This love that is ahead of sex is the one that raises the sexual genitalia from its level of genitals to a vital level of social humanity, represented in the loneliness with the other desire, voluntarily and love, and then accept the voluntary interaction with it, voluntary genitalia is a form of social life by other means.

If we move to the communities of this region, where sex is concentrated exclusively in the genitals, and where the limited mixing is generally prohibited from the establishment of previous acquaintance and harmony of sexual work, and access to the stage of reproductive or sexual work is subject to talks, agreements and negotiations, most of which are related to the material aspect, such as the dowry, the presenter and the rear, the possibility of concluding the agreement to practice a sexual life in the framework of marriage with a party of many parties, and the choice of this party is subject to the rules of the bazaar, i.e. material factors mainly, generally we do not see before the conclusion of the marriage contract enough to get acquainted and therefore closeness, love and harmony, sexual life begins as soon as the material aspects are agreed upon, and the agreement is usually between the agent of the woman to conclude the marriage agreement, while the male is represented in his person.

The subjection of the marriage agreement to the material factor means the violation of the article of the decision of who!, Here this sexual relationship can and must be defined as a pornographic relationship, who pays more to women, it is porn because the factor that determines its establishment is a material factor is not personal, and this means turning women into something permissible to the provisions of supply and demand … It is a commodity!.

The disguise of man means to cheapen it to the rank of the thing that buys and sells, the objectification is a concept of nihilistic contempt, if practiced by large segments of humanity, the human creature will still exist, the objectification is a shameful, humiliating, reprehensible and unacceptable concept, who is accused in this country of cheapening women to the thing that is bought and sold as a consumer material???? Is it the relationship of love prior to the reproductive-sexual stage or is it the convention that defines and brings together the signatory parties?

Most of the matter of dealing with the subject of genital or sex in general is subject to the size of the “I”, guardianship of the woman until marriage and even after marriage and the conclusion of the marriage contract hinders the arrival of this ego to the natural size possible in terms of independence, and thus the decision-making stemming from personal tendencies and desires, so the “I” of the woman is atroctive in the societies established on the system of patriarchal society, the atrophy of the female ego means weakness and lack of resistance, thus the state of atrophy and weakness of the ego allows the marriage contract to swallow this “ego”, the largeness of the ego means the opposite, the largeness of the ego does not allow the swallowing of this ego by what is outside the ego, and therefore the will turns into a marriage contract, while the weakness of the ego means without will, the will is taken by the system of parenthood, which is born to the contract, which is born to the flesh, the complex, and the merc of the nodes, and the relationship of the love after the development of the contract, which is the development of the nodes, which are the same, the body, and the mercus of the nodes, and the relationship of the complex, and this is the relationship of the love after the development of the contract, which is the development of the nodes, which allow the contract, the mercovlancy of the complex, and the mercile of the complexity.

The establishment of marriage on the following love for acquaintance, and thus the establishment of the genitals on love, represents a categorical negation of porn, which means the multiplicity of sexual partners where the man or woman has sex with many parties as was the case in the Stone Age animal, the largest source of porn is the marital home imposed without love, the hated man practices a kind of sex, which is in fact the rape of a legislator of the contract, the wife of the contract is logically looking for a voluntary dictation of her sexual life, and this sexual life is practiced with another besides her sexual life forced doctrinal, this is a form of sexual pransorm familiar and known in the late conservative circles, for example in the community of this region.

The common woman’s matter is the common man who is looking for the common woman in order to practice animal sex and not the human social, the common dimension of the man requires the construction of forts to protect women from the animal of the seeker of sex or rather the searcher for the vulva, protection turns into a form of ownership, consistent with the mentality of the patriarchal patriarchal society favorable to women, the problem of common women practically is the problem of the common man, and the problem lies in the man who targets her, and the most obvious examples of the common is the captivity in wars and the accumulation of slaves as numbers sometimes reached many thousands, for example in the Krakhant of the Caliph Al-Rasheed,

The other example is the mass rape of women by the mujahideen as embodied by the emirate or state of the succession of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. In many cases, women were gang-raped and then women were distributed to the men of the caliphate as the distribution of candy bars. Example of the commons of women was the case of Laila Umm Tamim, the wife of Malik bin Nuwaira, then Safiya, the daughter of Hayy and many others. Safiya was transformed into one of the harems of Ibn Abdullah, on the day that her father, then her husband, her brother and the rest of her people were slaughtered. The commons were in short, special male Bedouin, which moved with the heritage to the twenty-first century.